淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-0407200700485600
中文論文名稱 結合情境模擬之混成訓練成效評鑑:以「主管教導能力訓練」為例
英文論文名稱 The Examination into the Effectiveness of Situation Simulation Enhanced Blended Training: An Example of the Coaching Skills Training Program
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 教育科技學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Educational Technology
學年度 95
學期 2
出版年 96
研究生中文姓名 林淑雯
研究生英文姓名 Shu-wen Lin
學號 694100040
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2007-06-11
論文頁數 86頁
口試委員 指導教授-田冠鈞
委員-李世忠
委員-張國恩
中文關鍵字 訓練成效評鑑  企業教育訓練  模擬教材  教導能力 
英文關鍵字 Evaluation  Training  Simulation  Coaching 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學教育學
中文摘要 本研究旨在評鑑合作企業實施主管教導能力訓練之成效。研究者從380位接受主管教導能力訓練的學員中,以便利取樣抽取58位有效樣本,藉由學習滿意度問卷及行為表現檢核問卷,蒐集評鑑所需之量化與質化資料,並以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、配對樣本T檢定等統計方式分析之。研究結果顯示,學員本身對該訓練結果皆相當滿意,但在受訓前後,學員所屬員工對於學員所展現的教導能力之評分並沒有顯著差異。
根據研究結果,本研究建議合作企業在訓練過後,應持續投入資源,協助學員將教導能力應用到實際工作上。在後續研究方面,應改善研究工具,以對學員的反應與行為表現,做更精確的分析;並繼續蒐集更深入的資料,以瞭解學員在運用教導能力時,所遭遇的困難以及克服之道。
英文摘要 This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Coaching Skills Training Program adopted by an ODM supplier. The researcher used the questionnaire-survey method to collect quantitative and qualitative information at the first and third level of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model. A convenient sample of 58 trainees was selected from the supervisors participating in the Coaching Skills Training Program. Then, a reaction questionnaire was given to the sample, and a behavior inspection questionnaire to their subordinates. Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA and paired sample t-test were used to analyze the data.
The conclusions of the study were summarized as follows:
1. The degree of satisfaction toward the Coaching Skills Training Program was high.
2. There was no significant difference in the trainees’ marks for behavior before and after the Coaching Skills Training Program.
The ODM supplier is advised to continue the investment in the program in order to enhance actual practice of the coaching skills. For further research, improve the research instruments and give a more precise analysis of the trainees’ reaction and behavior. Subsume more information sources to probe into what effects trainees’ behavior and possible solutions to difficulties.
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 待答問題 5
第四節 名詞釋義 6
第五節 研究範圍與限制 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 教導能力 9
第二節 混成學習 16
第三節 模擬教材 23
第四節 訓練成效評鑑 34
第三章 簡介教導訓練 44
第四章 研究方法與設計 51
第一節 研究架構與流程 51
第二節 研究樣本 52
第三節 研究工具 54
第四節 實施程序 57
第五節 資料處理 59
第五章 研究結果 60
第一節 研究樣本個人特性資料分析 60
第二節 學習滿意度資料分析 62
第三節 行為表現資料分析 66
第六章 結論與建議 69
第一節 研究結果摘要 69
第二節 研究結果討論 70
第三節 對合作企業之建議 72
第四節 後續研究方向之建議 74
參考書目 76
附錄一:學習滿意度問卷 83
附錄二:行為表現檢核問卷 85
圖次
圖2- 1 經驗錐 22
圖2- 2 經驗學習圈 29
圖3- 1 Intro單元畫面 45
圖3- 2 Content單元畫面 46
圖3- 3 Simulation單元歡迎畫面 46
圖3- 4 案例選單畫面 47
圖3- 5 Simulation互動畫面 48
圖3- 6 coach功能畫面 48
圖3- 7 案例成績畫面 49
圖3- 8 成績分析畫面 50
圖3- 9 環境設定畫面 50
圖4- 1 研究流程 51
表次
表2- 1 學者對教導能力的定義 10
表2- 2 混成學習定義 17
表2- 3 可能導入混成學習的方法與媒介 18
表2- 4 規劃混成學習之考量因素 21
表2- 5 模擬教材分類 26
表2- 6 評鑑模式 36
表2- 7 Kirkpatrick的四個評鑑層次之關係 37
表2- 8 評鑑層次與資料蒐集方式對照表 43
表4- 1 研究樣本人數分配表 53
表4- 2 建立問卷效度之專家一覽 55
表4- 3教導訓練成效評鑑計畫 58
表5- 1 研究樣本個人特性分析 61
表5- 2 學習滿意度問卷調查結果分析 63
表5- 3 學習滿意度問卷開放式問題結果彙整表 64
表5- 4 行為表現檢核問卷前後測結果配對樣本T檢定摘要表 66
表5- 5 行為表現檢核問卷前後測開放式問題結果彙整表 67

參考文獻 王宗媛 (2001)。醫院志工訓練成效評估之研究—以嘉義基督教醫院志工隊為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
王惠美 (2007)。混成學習訓練成果輕鬆加倍。人才資本,6,36-39。
李世忠 (1999)。教學科技—評鑑與應用。台北:五南。
李詩鎮 (2004)。探索教育基礎理論。2006年7月16日,取自http://www.cyc.org.tw/se/Theory/Theory.htm
李鎮宇 (2006)。虛擬實境,讓你融入學習中。數位學習觀點電子報,40。2006年5月2日,取自http://www.elearn.org.tw/NR/exeres/9AE68482-0CE9-496C-8F29-76EC700F0D72.htm
吳瓊治 (2006)。訓練成效的評鑑。品質月刊,10,44-47。
卓雅偵 (1997)。組織因素與訓練移轉之相關研究—以壽險業務人員為例。國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林美純 (2005)。混成式學習教學設計—以931電腦與教學課程為例。2007年5月4日,取自國立彰化師範大學:http://dlearn.ncue.edu.tw/1000110183/931/931電腦與教學.doc
林麗惠 (1997)。成人參與在職進修訓練的自評成效及其相關因素之研究—以職訓局所屬職業訓練中心學員為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
計惠卿、李彩瑩、曾乙嵐、劉怡甫 (2006,12月)。客戶服務情境模擬數位教材之研發。論文發表於台灣教育傳播暨科技學會主辦之「台灣教育傳播暨科技學會2006年學術研討會」,台北。
許巧齡 (2004)。混成式學習新思維。游於藝雙月刊,47。2007年5月4日,取自http://www.hrd.gov.tw/09_develop/09_05_MONTHLY/number47/47-5-1.asp?version=47
許瑛玿 (1999)。網路科技支援之電腦教學軟體對學生學習科學概念的影響。師大學報:科學教育類,44(1&2),1-16。
張世忠 (2001)。建構教學-理論與應用。台北:五南。
張春興 (2004)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。
陳品華 (1997)。從認知觀點談情境學習與教學。教育資料與研究,15,53-59。
陳建成 (2004)。教育訓練新趨勢-體驗式學習法。2006年7月16日,取自http://www.cyc.org.tw/se/Documents/HTM/Experiential.htm
陳慧娟 (1998)。情境學習理論的理想與現實。教育資料與研究,25,47-55。
黃敏蕙 (2003)。連鎖業店長教導能力(Coaching)之研究-以咖啡業為例。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃雁萍 (2006)。如何評估訓練成效ROI。學習園區電子報,45。2006年10月2日,取自http://www.elearn.org.tw/eLearn/eNews/eL_Insight_045.htm
數位學習國家型科技計畫辦公室 (2004)。數位學習內容推動計畫中程綱要計畫書。2006年9月8日,取自http://elnpweb.ncu.edu.tw/data/2002/94_01_SED_02.PDF
廖致凱 (2004)。混成學習與企業變革。數位學習觀點電子報,1。2007年5月4日,取自http://www.elearn.org.tw/NR/exeres/D1C8B404-DDFD-46FC-B621-3FFA7B25633A.htm
劉楚慧 (2003)。部屬指導。2006年5月2日,取自http://media.career.com.tw/Careerbook/magshort.asp?CA_NO=329p100
戴幼農 (1994)。訓練評核的原則與方法。就業與訓練,12(4),16-22。
謝沛珊 (2004)。情境模擬數位教材設計之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
Fournies, F. F. (1978/ 2001). Coaching for improved work performance. 丁惠民、游琇雯(譯)。績效!績效!強化員工競爭力的教導對談篇。台北:麥格羅.希爾。
Peters, T. & Austin N. (1985/ 1986). A passion for excellence: The leadership difference. 陳茵英、黃美姝(譯)。卓越的熱潮:管理手冊。臺北:卓越文化事業公司.
Aldrich, C. (2004). Simulations and the future of learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing: the essential guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Alessi, S. M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 15(2), 40-47.
Alliger, G. M., Tannebaum, C. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H. & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personal Psychology, 50, 341-356.
Bigge, M. L. & Shermis, S. S. (1999). Learning theories for teachers (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
Brennan, M. (2004). Blended learning and business change. Chief Learning Officer Magazine, Retrieved May 4, 2007, from http://www.clomedia.com/content/templates/clo_fairfield.asp?articleid=349
Brocato, R. (2003). Coaching for improvement: An essential role for team leaders and managers. Journal for Quality & Participation, 26(1), 17-22.
Brown, J. (2001). Employees leave managers, not organizations. Computing Canada, 27(8), 25.
Burrow, J. & Berardinelli, P (2003). Systematic performance improvement- refining the space between learning and result. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(1), 6-13.
Chen, H. C. (2003) Cross-cultural construct validation of the learning transfer system inventory in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Chmielewski, T. L. & Phillips, J. J. (2002). Measuring return-on-investment in government: Issues and procedures. Public Personnel Management, 31(2), 225-237.
Choi, J. I. & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53-69.
Clark, D. (2006). An Epic white paper: Blended learning. Retrieved May 4, 2007, from Epic Performance Improvement Limted Web site: http://www.epic.co.uk/content/about_us/downloads/Epic_White_Paper_Blended_Learning.pdf
Cook, M. J. (1999). Effective coaching. Columbus, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Developing manager-employee trust. (2001). USA Today Magazine, 130(2675), 7.
Dick, W. (2006). Evaluation in instructional design: The impact of Kirkpatrick’s four-level model, In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 145-153). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Person Education, Inc.
Duhaney, D. C. (2004). Blended learning in education, training, and development. Performance Improvement, 43(8), 35-38.
Evered, R. D. & Selman J. C. (1990). Coaching and the art of management. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 16.
Goldstein, I. L. (1993). Training in Organizations: Need Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company.
Hartley, D. E. (2006). Learning can be fun. Training + Development, 60(5), 53-55.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M, Russell, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. (1996). Instructional media and technologies for learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Herman, J. L., Morris, L. L. & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). Evaluator’s handbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hill, C. C. & Semler, S. W. (2001). Simulation enhanced learning: Case studies in leadership development. Retrived November 11, from Personnel Decisions International Web site: http://www.personneldecisions.com/learning/pdfs/Simulation-Enhanced%20Learning_10.pdf
Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Iverson, K. & Colky, D. (2004). Scenario-based e-learning design. Performance Improvement, 43(1), 26-22.
Kelly, C. (1997). David Kolb, the theory of experiential learning and ESL. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(9), retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kelly-Experiential/
Kinlaw, D. C. (2000). Encourage superior performance from people and teams through coaching. Women in Business, 52(1), 38-41.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). The four-level evaluation process. In L. L. Ukens (Eds.), What smart trainers know: The secrets of success from the world’s foremost experts (pp. 122-159). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Lucas, R. W. (1994). Coaching skills: A guide for supervisors. Columbus, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Mackey, S. & Stockport, G. J. (2006). Blended learning, classroom and e-learning. The Business Review, 5(1), 82-88.
Miller, J. B. (1994). The corporate coach: How to build a team of loyal customers and happy employees (1st ed.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Morgan, R. B. & Casper, W. J. (2000). Examining the factor structure of participant reactions to training: A multidimensional approach. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 301-317.
Newstrom, J. W. (1978). Catch-22: The problems of incomplete evaluation of training. Training and Development Journal, 32(11), 22-24.
Phillips, J. J. (1997). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.
Phillips, J. J. & Phillips P. P. (2001). In action: Measuring return on investment, volume 3. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
Reeves, T. (1992). Evaluating interactive multimedia. Educational Technology, 32(5), 47-53.
Rosset, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Education Technology Publication.
Rossett, A., Douglis, F., & Frazee, R. V. (2003). Strategies for building blended learning. Retrieved May 4, 2007, from Learning Circuits Web site: http://www.learningcircuits.org/2003/jul2003/rossett.htm
Rossett, A. & Frazee, R. V. (2006). Blended learning opportunities. Retrived May 4, 2007, from American Management Association Web site: https://www.amanet.org/blended/pdf/WhitePaper_BlendLearn.pdf
Shuell, T. J. (1990). Phases of meaningful learnig. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 531-547.
Singh, H. & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Retrieved May 7, 2007, from Centra Software Web site: http://www.centra.com/download/whitepapers/blendedlearning.pdf
Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Straus, S. G., Williams, V. L, Bondanella, J. R, Oaks, D. & Ettedgui, E. (2003). Designing assessments of microworld training for combat service support staff. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tan, J. A., Hall, R. J. & Boyce, C. (2003). The role of employee reactions in predicting training effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 397-411.
Thornby, D. & Pettrey, L. (2005). Coaching others for a higher level of performance. Critical Care Nurse, 25, 28-30.
Tracy, D. & Morin, W. J. (2001). Truth, trust, and the bottom line: 7 steps to trust-based management. Chicago, IL: Kaplan Publishing.
Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended learning models. Retrieved May 4, 2007, from Learning Circuits Web site: http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/aug2002/valiathan.html
Voci, E. & Young, K. (2001). Blended learning working in a leadership development programme. Industrial and Commercial Training, 33(4/5), 157-160.
Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41, 75-86.
Weinstein, M. (2006). Even better than the real thing? Training, 43(6), 33-39.
Werner, J. M. & DeSimone, R. L. (2006). Human resource development (4th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education.
West, C. & Snellen, J. (1991). A Report on the Research and Development of Instructional Simulation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 340362)
Wile, D. (1996). Why doers do? Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 30-35.
Woolnought, R. (2006). The means to a blend. Training & Coaching Today, 12-13.
Yelon, S. (2006). Face-to-face or online? Choosing the medium in blended training. Performance Improvement, 45(3), 22-26.
Zenger, J. H. & Hargis, K. (1982). Assessment of training results: It’s time to take the plunge. Training & Development, 36(1), 11-16.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2008-07-16公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2008-07-16起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信