§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-0308201608322700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2016.00098
論文名稱(中文) 應用賽局觀點探討以網路為基礎服務之策略性合作
論文名稱(英文) A Game Theoretical Approach for Strategic Cooperation of Online Services
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 李丞斌
研究生(英文) Cheng-Bin Lee
學號 602610353
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2016-06-16
論文頁數 97頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張瑋倫(wlchang@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 李月華(yuehhua@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 許瑋元(carolhsu(AT)ntu.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 網路服務
傳訊賽局
服務聯盟
關鍵字(英) Online Service
Signal Game
Service Alliance
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
網路服務日漸繁盛,對於提供網路服務之企業及線上平台業者而言,如何提升使用者價值及流覽率為其重要課題。而網路服務產業多以併購為主,近年許多大型平台,如Google之蒐尋引擎、Tripadvisor之旅遊評論網站、Yahoo入口網站亦或Facebook之社群平台等,皆以增加使用者價值為出發,尋求多元網路服務以求增加使用者之使用率。而許多新興之網路服務供給企業則期以與線上平台業者進行合作,藉以增加使用者人數。在策略性合作關係中,根據麥肯錫公司於2000年統計,其失敗率高達60%。本研究以網路服務為基礎,以及策略性合作之觀點出發,發展出兩個研究問題首先,為以網路服務合作基礎出發,探討現上平台業者在面臨合作之篩選機制為何?接著,為當網路服務供給企業與線上平台業者之合作關係確認時,所能維持該項合作之長期誘因為何?期以透過兩研究問題,得出雙方合作下之篩選機制,進而達成服務聯盟之長期穩定的因子。並藉以合作關係取代網路公司之併購風潮。
本研究透過傳訊賽局之研究架構為出發,傳訊賽局主要解決資訊不對稱之動態賽局。透過資訊豐富度定義網路服務供給企業之類型,以及資訊強度為傳送訊號,使得大型平台或入口網站進而與之合作。並且假定線上平台業者之評估變數、網路服務供給企業之評估變數個五項,透過數理模型之假定,利用傳訊賽局之兩大均衡:分離均衡及混合均衡之概念進行變數概念推導。而透過變數推導及動態完美均衡之條件,進而找出合作之誘因。在變數方面,過往文獻皆以有形價值為主,本研究融入網路服務之特性,加入無形價值進行討論。根據模型推導結果,在合作之條件之下,網絡外部性以及服務價值為其主要影響合作之主要因子。當合作關係發生時,網絡外部性及服務價值兩部分大於成本因素時,便會使雙方有誘因進行長期合作,進而達成網路服務聯盟之概念誘因。而網絡外部性會使合作關係下形成正向循環,因此對於新創網路服務供給企業而言有利。對於線上平台業者而言,能提升使用者價值,乃藉以提供貼近顧客服務為出發,因此合作後,能提升使用者對於該線上平台業者之依賴性,進而達成雙方合作之穩固性。
英文摘要
Online services are increasingly flourishing decades. It is an important for online service providers and portal webiste or platfrom to improve customer value and increase browsing rate. In particular, mergers and acquisitions is the mainstream for online service field and certain platforms such as Google, Tripadvisor, or Facebookstarted to cooperate to other sevice providers to enhance customer value. According to the report of Mckinsey & Company’s (2000), 60% of failure rate in the tactical parnterships. This research proposes two research questions based on strategic cooperation. (1) whatis the criteria between platforms and online service provider before cooperation? (2) how to maintain the stability wihtin alliance and  what is the longterm incentive for partnership? 
Our framework is based on the concept of signaling game which is a dynamic game to solve the asymmetric information problems.  We use information richness as the type of online service providers and information intensity as the signals. Online service provider is the sender and the platform owner as a receiver. After receiving the signal, the receiver has to decide the best move for cooperation. For both of sender and receiver, we set five variables and assume the conditions for their movements in the game. This study proposed mathematical models and assumed the separating equilibrium and pooling by investigating the major factors in partnerships. In addition, past researches already used tangible variables to measure the senders’ type and payoffs. Our research integrated tangible and intangible variables to infer the type of sender and payoffs. The results of mathematical derivation showed the main incentives for cooperation are network externalities and users’ value. Once network externality and users’ values are greater than the costs, online service provider and platform owner may agree accept the cooperation. The network externality can increase the number of users for online service provider by cooperate with the platform owner. Platform owner not only can enhance the users’ value by providing online service to fit in users’ need, but also can increase the dependence on the platform. It is a win-win strategy for both sides. Finally, online service provider and platform owner have incentives for long-term partnerships which may be a concept of strategic alliance of online service.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄 
目錄................................................................................................................................ I 
表目錄.......................................................................................................................... III 
圖目錄.......................................................................................................................... IV 
第一章 緒論.................................................................................................................. 1 
第一節 研究背景 ................................................................................................... 1 
第二節 研究動機 ................................................................................................... 5 
第三節 研究問題 ................................................................................................... 7 
第四節 研究目的 ................................................................................................... 9 
第二章 文獻探討........................................................................................................ 11 
第一節 策略聯盟(Strategic Alliance) ................................................................. 11 
第二節 傳訊賽局(Signaling Game) .................................................................... 14 
第三章 研究方法........................................................................................................ 18 
第一節 研究架構 ................................................................................................. 18 
第二節 傳訊賽局 ................................................................................................. 20 
第四章 模型推導........................................................................................................ 31 
第一節 分離均衡(Separating Equilibrium) ......................................................... 36 
第二節 混合均衡(Pooling Equilibrium) ............................................................. 56 
第五章 綜合分析........................................................................................................ 74 
第一節 分離均衡 ................................................................................................. 75 
第二節、混合均衡 ............................................................................................... 81 
第六章 結論................................................................................................................ 85 
第一節 研究結論 ................................................................................................. 85 
第二節 管理與實務意涵 ..................................................................................... 88 
第三節 研究限制 ................................................................................................. 89 
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 90 
英文部分 ............................................................................................................... 90 
網站部分 ............................................................................................................... 97 

表目錄 
表格2-1 傳訊賽局之相關應用整理 ......................................................................... 17 
表格3-1 四種賽局型態之均衡 ................................................................................. 20 
表格3-2 傳訊賽局元素對照表 ................................................................................. 26 
表格3-3 傳訊賽局之參數設定 ................................................................................. 29 
表格4-1 入口網站報酬之變數設定 ......................................................................... 32 
表格4-2 網路服務供給企業報酬之變數設定 ......................................................... 33 
表格4-3 分離均衡之報酬 ......................................................................................... 37 
表格4-4 分離均衡之報酬 ......................................................................................... 47 

圖目錄 
圖1-1 2013年各國服務業占GDP比率 ..................................................................... 1 
圖1-2 2014年各國網路經濟轉換GDP比重 ............................................................. 2 
圖1-3 2014年網路使用者的成長情況 ....................................................................... 2 
圖3-1 研究架構 ......................................................................................................... 18 
圖3-2 策略合作之傳訊賽局 ..................................................................................... 24 
圖4-1分離均衡 .......................................................................................................... 36 
圖4-2 分離均衡 ......................................................................................................... 46 
圖4-3 混合均衡 ......................................................................................................... 56 
圖4-4 混合均衡 ......................................................................................................... 65 
圖5-1 本研究傳訊賽局之決策樹 ............................................................................. 74 
圖5-2 分離均衡(1)之決策樹..................................................................................... 75 
圖5-3 分離均衡(2)之決策樹..................................................................................... 78 
圖5-4 混合均衡(1)之決策樹..................................................................................... 81 
圖5-5 混合均衡(2)之決策樹..................................................................................... 83
參考文獻
[1].	Aaker, D. A. (1990). Brand extensions: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 47-56. 
[2].	Abdulkadiroglu, A., & Sönmez, T. (2003). School choice: A mechanism design approach. The American Economic Review, 93(3), 729-747. 
[3].	Abramson, J., & Rosenthal, B. (1995). Interdisciplinary and inter-organizational collaboration. Encyclopedia of Social Work, 2, 1479-1489. 
[4].	Aguirregabiria, V., & Mira, P. (2005). A genetic algorithm for the structural estimation of games with multiple equilibria. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, Boston University.[24], 
[5].	Aumann, R. J., & Maschler, M. (1995). Repeated games with incomplete information MIT press. 
[6].	Bajari, P., Benkard, C. L., & Levin, J. (2007). Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica, 75(5), 1331-1370. 
[7].	Bajari, P., Hong, H., & Ryan, S. (2004). Identification and estimation of normal form games. Manuscript, Duke University, 
[8].	Baranson, J. (1990). Transnational strategic alliances: Why, what, where and how. Multinational Business, 2(1), 54-61. 
[9].	Beamish, P. W., & Inkpen, A. C. (1995). Keeping international joint ventures stable and profitable. Long Range Planning, 28(3), 2-36. 
[10].	Berry, J. W. (1992). Acculturation and adaptation in a new society. International Migration, 30(s1), 69-85. 
[11].	Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and" the bird in the hand" fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259-270. 
[12].	Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. (2008). Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation. California Management Review, 50(3), 66. 
[13].	Bjorn, P. A., & Vuong, Q. H. (1984). Simultaneous Equations Models for Dummy Endogenous Variables: A Game Theoretic Formulation with an Application to Labor Force Participation, 
[14].	Bjorn, P. A., & Vuong, Q. H. (1985). Econometric modeling of a stackelberg game with an application to labor force participation California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Working Papers: 577. 
[15].	Bleeke, J., & Ernst, D. (1995). Is your strategic alliance really a sale? Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 97-105. 
[16].	Bollé, D. (1985). Sum rules in scattering theory and applications to statistical mechanics. 
[17].	Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value. Journal of consumer research, 17(4), 375-384.
[18].	Brealey, R., Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. The Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387. 
[19].	Bresnahan, T. F., & Reiss, P. C. (1991). Empirical models of discrete games. Journal of Econometrics, 48(1), 57-81. 
[20].	Brock, W. A., & Durlauf, S. N. (2001). Discrete choice with social interactions. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(2), 235-260. 
[21].	Brock, W. A., & Durlauf, S. N. (2002). A multinomial-choice model of neighborhood effects. American Economic Review, 92(2), 298-303. 
[22].	Brock, W., & Durlauf, S. N. (2003). Multinomial Choice with Social Interactions, 
[23].	Brown, C. G. (2009). The death of christian britain: Understanding secularisation, 1800–2000 Routledge. 
[24].	Burgers, W. P., Hill, C. W., & Kim, W. C. (1993). A theory of global strategic alliances: The case of the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 419-432. 
[25].	Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., Galeano, N., & Molina, A. (2009). Collaborative networked organizations - concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(1), 46. 
[26].	Chase, M. W., Cowan, R. S., Hollingsworth, P. M., Van Den Berg, C., Madriñán, S., Petersen, G., . . . Carine, M. (2007). A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon, 56(2), 295-299. 
[27].	Chaudhuri, S., & Tabrizi, B. (1999). Capturing the real value in high-tech acquisitions. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 123-30, 185. 
[28].	Ciliberto, F., & Tamer, E. (2004). Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Unpublished Manuscript, 
[29].	Ciliberto, F., & Tamer, E. (2009). Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Econometrica, 77(6), 1791-1828. 
[30].	Crook, T. R., Ketchen, D. J., Combs, J. G., & Todd, S. Y. (2008). Strategic resources and performance: A meta‐analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1141-1154. 
[31].	Curiel, I. (1997). Cooperative game theory and applications: Cooperative games arising from combinatorial optimization problems Springer. 
[32].	Dacin, M. T., Hitt, M. A., & Levitas, E. (1997). Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of US and korean firms. Journal of World Business, 32(1), 3-16.
[33].	Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: a new approach to manager information processing and organisational design. Research in Organisational Behaviour. 
[34].	Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31-61. 
[35].	Davis, J. P., Steury, K., & Pagulayan, R. (2005). A survey method for assessing perceptions of a game: The consumer playtest in game design. Game Studies, 5(1) 
[36].	Devlin, G., & Bleackley, M. (1988). Strategic alliances—guidelines for success. Long Range Planning, 21(5), 18-23. 
[37].	Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, , 307-319. 
[38].	Duarte, C. C., Brasão, A., & Pintassilgo, P. (2000). Management of the northern atlantic bluefin tuna: An application of c-games. Marine Resource Economics, 15(1), 21-36
[39].	Dymsza, W. A. (1988). Successes and failures of joint ventures in developing countries - lessons from experience. Cooperative strategies in international business. joint ventures and technology partnerships between firms (pp. 403-424) Lexington Books. 
[40].	Farmer, A., & Pecorino, P. (1994). Pretrial negotiations with asymmetric information on risk preferences. International Review of Law and Economics, 14(3), 273-281. 
[41].	Frisk, M., Göthe-Lundgren, M., Jörnsten, K., & Rönnqvist, M. (2010). Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 448-458. 
[42].	Gale, D., & Shapley, L. S. (1962). College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1), 9-15. 
[43].	Ganji, A., Karamouz, M., & Khalili, D. (2007). Development of stochastic dynamic nash game model for reservoir operation II. the value of players’ information availability and cooperative behaviors. Advances in Water Resources, 30(1), 157-168. 
[44].	Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), 425-440. 
[45].	Giannoccaro, I., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2004). Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 131-139. 
[46].	Gibbons, R. S. (1997). An Introduction to Applicable Game Theory, 
[47].	Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420. 
[48].	Hajduk, P. J. (2006). Fragment-based drug design: How big is too big? Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49(24), 6972-6976. 
[49].	Hall, R. E., & Milgrom, P. R. (2005). The Limited Influence of Unemployment on the Wage Bargain, 
[50].	Harbison, J. R., & Pekar, P. (1998). Institutionalising alliance skills: Secrets of repeatable success. Strategy and Business, 79-94. 
[51].	Harbison, J. R., Pekar, P. P., & Stasior, W. F. (1998). Smart alliances: A practical guide to repeatable success Jossey-Bass San Francisco. 
[52].	Harrigan, K. R. (1987). Strategic alliances-their new role in global competition. Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(2), 67-69. 
[53].	Hennart, J., & Reddy, S. (1997). The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: The case of japanese investors in the united states. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 1-12. 
[54].	Heyes, A., Rickman, N., & Tzavara, D. (2004). Legal expenses insurance, risk aversion and litigation. International Review of Law and Economics, 24(1), 107-119. 
[55].	Hitt, M., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. (2012). Strategic management cases: Competitiveness and globalization Cengage Learning. 
[56].	Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28(3), 413-446. 
[57].	Jiang, B., Ni, J., & Srinivasan, K. (2014). Signaling through pricing by service providers with social preferences. Marketing Science, 
[58].	Johnston, R., & Lawrence, P. R. (1991). Beyond vertical integration–the rise of the value-adding partnership. Thompson, G. (Et Al.)(Eds.), Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, the Coordination of Social Life, Sage, London, 193-202. 
[59].	Kalai, E., & Smorodinsky, M. (1975). Other solutions to nash's bargaining problem. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 513-518. 
[60].	Kamecke, U. (1992). On the uniqueness of the solution to a large linear assignment problem. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21(6), 509-521. 
[61].	Kaneko, C. R. (1999). Eye movement deficits following ibotenic acid lesions of the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi in monkeys II. pursuit, vestibular, and optokinetic responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81(2), 668-681. 
[62].	Kanodia, C., & Lee, D. (1998). Investment and disclosure: The disciplinary role of periodic performance reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), 33-55. 
[63].	Kelly, K. (1999). New rules for the new economy. Penguin.
[64].	Kerachian, R., & Karamouz, M. (2006). Optimal reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: A stochastic conflict resolution approach. Water Resources Research, 42(12) 
[65].	Kerachian, R., & Karamouz, M. (2007). A stochastic conflict resolution model for water quality management in reservoir–river systems. Advances in Water Resources, 30(4), 866-882. 
[66].	Kihlstrom, R. E., & Riordan, M. H. (1984). Advertising as a signal. The Journal of Political Economy, 427-450. 
[67].	Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319-332. 
[68].	Krajewska, M. A., Kopfer, H., Laporte, G., Ropke, S., & Zaccour, G. (2008). Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: Request allocation and profit sharing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(11), 1483-1491. 
[69].	Ku, E. C. S., & Fan, Y. W. (2009). Knowledge sharing and customer relationship management in the travel service alliances. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(12), 1407. 
[70].	Ku, E. C. S., & Fan, Y. W. (2009). Knowledge sharing and customer relationship management in the travel service alliances. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(12), 1407. 
[71].	Kwon, H., Pardo, T. A., & Burke, G. B. (2009). Interorganizational collaboration and community building for the preservation of state government digital information: Lessons from NDIIPP state partnership initiative. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 186-192. 
[72].	Lafontaine, F., & Shaw, K. L. (1999). The dynamics of franchise contracting: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Political Economy, 107(5), 1041-1080. 
[73].	Lei-gang, Z., Lin, L., & Qin-hai, M. (2005). Research on profit distributive strategy of manufacturers and retailers in a supply chain. Journal of Systems Engineering, 20(6), 644-648. 
[74].	Lewis, J. D. (2002). Partnerships for profit: Structuring and managing strategic alliances Simon and Schuster. 
[75].	Lindroos, M. (2004). Sharing the benefits of cooperation in the norwegian spring-spawning herring fishery. International Game Theory Review, 6(01), 35-53. 
[76].	Liu, L., Tang, H., & Chen, Z. (2006). Application of the shapley value in game analysis of benefit distribution of agile virtual enterprise. Industrial Engineering Journal-Guangzou-, 9(6), 118. 
[77].	Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (2008). Marriage market equilibrium and bargaining in marriage. Manuscript, University of Washington, 
[78].	MacKenzie, A. B., & Wicker, S. B. (2001). Game theory and the design of self-configuring, adaptive wireless networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 39(11), 126-131. 
[79].	MacKenzie, A. B., & Wicker, S. B. (2001). Game theory in communications: Motivation, explanation, and application to power control. Paper presented at the Global Telecommunications Conference, 2001. GLOBECOM'01. IEEE, 2 821-826. 
[80].	Marciukaityte, D., Roskelley, K., & Wang, H. (2009). Strategic alliances by financial services firms. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1193-1199. 
[81].	Mazzeo, M. J. (2002). Competitive outcomes in product-differentiated oligopoly. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 716-728. 
[82].	Metcalfe, B. (1995). Metcalfe’s law: A network becomes more valuable as it reaches more users. Infoworld, 17(40), 53-54. 
[83].	Michael Geringer J. (1988). Partner selection criteria for developed country joint ventures. Business Quarterly (1986-1998), 53(1), 55.
[84].	Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. The Journal of Political Economy, , 796-821. 
[85].	Miller, M. H., & Rock, K. (1985). Dividend policy under asymmetric information. The Journal of Finance, 40(4), 1031-1051. 
[86].	Mortensen, D. T., & Pissarides, C. A. (1994). Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), 397-415. 
[87].	Narus, J. A., & Anderson, J. C. (1986). Industrial distributor selling: The roles of outside and inside sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 15(1), 55-62. 
[88].	Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48-49. 
[89].	Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1974). Neoclassical vs. evolutionary theories of economic growth: Critique and prospectus. The Economic Journal, , 886-905. 
[90].	Nosaka, H. (2007). Specialization and competition in marriage models. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1), 104-119. 
[91].	Ohmae, K. (1989). The global logic of strategic alliances. Harvard Business Review, 67(2), 143-154.
[92].	Oliver, M. (1986). Social policy and disability: Some theoretical issues. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1(1), 5-17. 
[93].	Pakes, A., Ostrovsky, M., & Berry, S. (2007). Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit examples). The Rand Journal of Economics, 38(2), 373-399. 
[94].	Pan, H., Chen, R., & Zhang, X. (2005). From direct marketing to distribution: An economic analysis on the effect of the relationship of distribution channel [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 3, 127-131. 
[95].	Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing, 41-50. 
[96].	Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (1997). The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 279-307. 
[97].	Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829. 
[98].	Pesendorfer, M., & Schmidt-Dengler, P. (2003). Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games, (No. w9726). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[99].	Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategies. New York, 
[100].	Porter, M. E., & Fuller, M. B. (1986). Coalitions and global strategy. Competition in Global Industries, 1(10), 315-343. 
[101].	Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage
[102].	Reinhardt, G., & Dada, M. (2005). Allocating the gains from resource pooling with the shapley value. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(8), 997-1000. 
[103].	Ross, S. B. (1977). On the mode of action of central stimulatory agents. Acta Pharmacologica Et Toxicologica, 41(4), 392-396. 
[104].	Roth, A. E. (1984). Misrepresentation and stability in the marriage problem. Journal of Economic Theory, 34(2), 383-387. 
[105].	Roth, A. E., & Vate, J. H. V. (1990). Random paths to stability in two-sided matching. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1475-1480. 
[106].	Sasaki, H., & Toda, M. (1992). Consistency and characterization of the core of two-sided matching problems. Journal of Economic Theory, 56(1), 218-227. 
[107].	Shapley, L. S. (1962). Complements and substitutes in the opttmal assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(1), 45-48. 
[108].	Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 355-374. 
[109].	Stein, J. C. (1989). Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 655-669. 
[110].	Strate, R. W., & Rappole, C. L. (1997). Strategic alliances between hotels and restaurants. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 50-61. 
[111].	Swanson, T., & Mason, R. (1998). Nonbargaining in the shadow of the law. International Review of Law and Economics, 18(2), 121-140. 
[112].	Sweeting, A. (2004). Coordination games, multiple equilibria and the timing of radio commercials. Work.Pap., Duke Univ, 
[113].	Tamer, E. (2003). Incomplete simultaneous discrete response model with multiple equilibria. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(1), 147-165. 
[114].	Toivanen, O., & Waterson, M. (2000). Empirical research on discrete choice game theory models of entry: An illustration. European Economic Review, 44(4), 985-992. 
[115].	Ul-Haq, R., & Howcroft, B. (2007). An examination of strategic alliances and the origins of international banking in europe. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(2), 120-139. 
[116].	Williamson, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4), 1537-1568. 
[117].	Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.
[118].	ZHANG, G., & LIU, Z. (2006). A stackelberg game of profit division in supply chains with dominant firms [J]. Systems Engineering, 11, 003.
網站部分
[119].	The World Factbook,2013 https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
[120].	Boston Consulting Group,2014 https://www.bcgperspectives.com/?redirectUrl=%2falumni%2falumni&login=true
[121].	KPCB ,2014  http://www.kpcb.com/internet-trends
[122].	CPC管理資訊中心,2016 http://mymkc.com/articles/contents.aspx?ArticleID=21445
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信