近年來，臺灣鼓吹創業風，創業意向調查顯示臺灣青年創業意願較高。此外，在2018年「世界經濟論壇東協峰會(WEF-ASEAN)」越南政府表示以創業者和創新創業為經濟發展的重點，推動創業者互動與科技方面的合作，讓東南亞成為創新創業的中心。進入以知識、科技和創新為主的年代，加上第四次工業革命，創業的重要性成為各行業討論的熱門話題。本研究認為創業是極為重要的研究課題，值得深入探討。
Lim (2014)在研究中表示人格特質對創業意圖有正向影響。葉千禎 (2009)指出具有先前知識愈多會增加個人之創業意圖，而蔡佳良 (2017)發現外在環境對創業意圖有正向影響。因此本研究聚焦在探討創業意圖，將創業家特質和先前知識為出發點，並以外在環境為調節變項，希望探索出創業家特質、先前知識、外在環境對創業意圖之影響。另外，隨著時間及地區的不同，得出的結論也有所差異，因此本研究將臺灣與越南兩者比較分析，以提供給政府、創業者以及相關團體作為參考。
本研究問卷主要以臺北地區與胡志明市地區中工作者為研究對象，透過便利抽樣及滾雪球抽樣的方式來進行調查，收回 456 份，其中臺灣與越南各123份有效問卷。並以項目分析、信度分析、因素分析、迴歸分析、層級迴歸分析、T 檢定和變異數分析等統計方法來驗證各研究假設，研究結果如下：
H1. 創業家特質對創業意圖具有顯著正向影響-成立。
H2. 先前知識對創業意圖具有顯著正向影響-成立。
H3. 外在環境在創業家特質對創業意圖之影響上具有正向調節效果-部分成立。
H4. 外在環境在先前知識對創業意圖之影響上具有正向調節效果-部分成立。
H5. 不同人口統計變項的工作者在創業家特質、先前知識、外在環境以及創業意圖有部分顯著差異-部分成立。
進一步將臺灣與越南各構面比較發現臺灣工作者在創新、風險承擔、先前知識、知識獲得顯著高於越南工作者；而越南的工作者在成就需求、外在環境、經濟科技環境、創業意圖、意圖強度、意圖利益顯著高於臺灣工作者。
由研究結果可以提供給有志創業者來衡量自己，根據自己的興趣來規劃選修特定課程；建議政府部門，創業相關單位可透過對個人特質的分析，找尋目標潛在創業者；學校在教育上規劃課程讓民眾早啟發創業特質，透過教育培訓來加強化創業所需要的專業知識；亦可建構創業者交流平台、創業論壇、諮詢輔導，進一步設置可行之解決方案，創造友善的環境來提升創業意圖。

In recent years, Taiwan has encouraged the development of startups. The entrepreneurial intention survey found that Taiwan’s youth entrepreneurship was high. In 2018 World Economic Forum on ASEAN, Vietnam's government said that innovation and entrepreneurship were the focus of economic development as well as expected the cooperation between entrepreneurship and technology will make Southeast Asia become the center of innovation and entrepreneurship. Entering the knowledge, technology, innovation era and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the important of entrepreneurship is currently discussed as a hot topic. This study dedicated entrepreneurship as an important topic that deserves to be considered research in detail. 
Lim (2014) said that personality traits have positive effect of entrepreneurial intention. Ye Qianxi (2009) pointed out that higher prior knowledge and entrepreneurial intention may also increase. Cai Jialiang (2017) found that the external environment has positive influence on entrepreneurial intention. Therefore, this study expected to explore the impact of entrepreneurial traits, prior knowledge and external environment on entrepreneurial intentions. Moreover, results are also different with time and region, therefore, this study compared Taiwan and Vietnam to provide as a reference to government and entrepreneurial related groups.
This study collected 456 valid questionnaires from Taipei and Ho Chi Minh City employees, conducted by convenient sampling and snowball sampling, statistical methods such as item analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, regression and hierarchical regression analysis, T test, ANOVA were using to test research hypothesis.The results were as follows:
H1. Entrepreneur traits have positive influence on entrepreneurial intention- supported.
H2. Prior knowledge has positive influence on entrepreneurial intention- supported.
H3.The external environment has positive moderator influence on the impact of entrepreneurial traits to entrepreneurial intention- partial supported.
H4.The external environment has positive moderator influence on the impact of prior knowledge to entrepreneurial intention- partial supported.
H5.Different demographic variables of employees have significant differences on entrepreneurial traits, prior knowledge, external environment and entrepreneurial intention- partial supported.
A further comparison of Taiwan and Vietnam found that Taiwanese employees had higher innovation, risk-taking, prior knowledge than Vietnamese employees and Vietnamese employees were more higher than Taiwanese employees in terms of achievement needs, external environment, economic and technological environment, entrepreneurial intentions and intention intensity.
The results of this study can be provided to aspiring entrepreneurs to measure themselves; government departments also can find potential entrepreneurs through analysis of personal traits. Schools could strengthen the knowledge which required for entrepreneurship through education and training. It can also construct an entrepreneur exchange platform, an entrepreneurial forum and counseling. Further set up a workable solution to enhance entrepreneurial intention.

目錄
目錄	I
表目錄	II
圖目錄	III
第一章	緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節	研究目的	9
第三節	研究流程	10
第二章	文獻探討	12
第一節	創業家特質	12
第二節	先前知識	16
第三節	外在環境	18
第四節	創業意圖	21
第五節	研究變項間之關係	24
第三章	研究方法	29
第一節	研究架構與假設	29
第二節	問卷設計	30
第三節	研究對象與範圍	35
第四節	資料分析方法	35
第四章	研究結果	38
第一節	問卷發放與回收資料分析	38
第二節	項目分析	41
第三節	信度分析與因素分析	42
第四節	研究架構與假設修正	51
第五節	研究假設驗證	53
第六節	不同人口統計變項在各變項之差異分析	75
第七節	臺灣與越南之比較	101
第八節	假設驗證結果彙整	102
第五章	結論、討論及建議	104
第一節	研究結論與討論	104
第二節	管理意涵	109
第三節	研究限制與未來研究之建議	113
參考文獻	115
中文部分	115
英文部分	117
網路部分	124
附錄 問卷	126

 
表 目 錄
表 1-1 GEM創業基礎條件	5
表 2-1 外在環境構面	3
表 3-1 創業家特質之衡量問項表	31
表 3-2 先前知識之衡量問項表	32
表 3-3 外在環境之衡量問項表	33
表 3-4 創業意圖之衡量問項表	34
表 4-1 樣本基本資料之次數分配表	40
表 4-2 各構面之項目分析表	42
表 4-3 各構面之Cronbach’s α值	43
表 4-4 各構面之KMO值與Bartlett球形檢定	45
表 4-5 創業家特質之因素分析與信度分析	46
表 4-6 先前知識之因素分析與信度分析	48
表 4-7 外在環境之因素分析與信度分析	49
表 4-8 創業意圖之因素分析與信度分析	49
表 4-9 假設修改彙整表	52
表 4-10 各變項之相關係數表	54
表 4-11 創業家特質對創業意圖之迴歸分析	54
表 4-12 創業家特質意圖之成就需求、創新、風險承擔、內控迴歸分析	55 
表 4-13 臺灣創業家特質對創業意圖之迴歸分析	56
表 4-14 越南創業家特質對創業意圖之迴歸分析	56
表 4-15 先前知識對創業意圖之迴歸分析	57
表 4-16 先前知識之知識獲得、經驗累積對創業意圖之迴歸分析	57
表 4-17 臺灣先前知識對創業意圖之迴歸分析	58
表 4-18 越南先前知識對創業意圖之迴歸分析	59
表 4-19 外在環境在創業家特質對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	60
表 4-20 外在環境在成就需求對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	61
表 4-21 外在環境在創新對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	62
表 4-22 外在環境在風險承擔對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	63
表 4-23 外在環境在內控對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	64
表 4-24 經濟科技環境在創業家特質對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	65
表 4-25 政治政策環境在創業家特質對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	66
表 4-26 臺灣外在環境在創業家特質對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	67
表 4-27 越南外在環境在創業家特質對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	68
表 4-28 外在環境在先前知識對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	69
表 4-29 外在環境在知識獲得對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	70
表 4-30 外在環境在經驗累積對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	71
表 4-31 經濟科技環境在先前知識對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	72
表 4-32 政治政策環境在先前知識對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	71
表 4-33 臺灣外在環境在先前知識對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	73
表 4-34 越南外在環境在先前知識對創業意圖影響上之調節效果的層級迴歸分析	74
表 4-35 性別在各變項之差異分析	75
表 4-36 臺灣性別在各變項之差異分析	76
表 4-37 越南性別在各變項之差異分析	76
表 4-38 婚姻狀況在各變項之差異分析	77
表 4-39 臺灣婚姻狀況在各變項之差異分析	77
表 4-40 越南婚姻狀況在各變項之差異分析	78
表 4-41 年齡在各變項之差異分析	78
表 4-42 臺灣年齡在各變項之差異分析	80
表 4-43 越南年齡在各變項之差異分析	81
表 4-44 教育程度在各變項之差異分析	82
表 4-45 臺灣教育程度在各變項之差異分析	83
表 4-46 越南教育程度在各變項之差異分析	84
表 4-47 職業類別在各變項之差異分析	85
表 4-48 臺灣職業類別在各變項之差異分析	86
表 4-49 越南職業類別在各變項之差異分析	88
表 4-50 目前職級在各變項之差異分析	89
表 4-51 臺灣目前職級在各變項之差異分析	90
表 4-52 越南目前職級在各變項之差異分析	92
表 4-53 月薪在各變項之差異分析	93
表 4-54 臺灣月薪在各變項之差異分析	94
表 4-55 越南月薪在各變項之差異分析	96
表 4-56 工作以來總年資在各變項之差異分析	97
表 4-57 臺灣工作以來總年資在各變項之差異分析	99
表 4-58 越南工作以來總年資在各變項之差異分析	100
表 4-59 臺灣與越南之比較差異	101
表 4-60 假設驗證結果彙整表	102
表 5-1  人口統計變項在各構面之顯著差異彙整表	106


 
圖 目 錄
圖 1-1	2018臺灣青年創業意向	2
圖 1-2	2018越南科技業者創業意向	2
圖 1-3	從2011至2016年間，臺灣新創公司的存活率	3
圖 1-4	越南各年前十月新創企業以及解體企業狀況	3
圖 1-5	臺灣與越南指數在探討環境對與創業過程的影響	6
圖 1-6	臺灣與越南指數在創業精神	7
圖 1-7	研究流程圖	11
圖 3-1	研究架構圖	29
圖 4-1	研究架構修正圖	51

參考文獻
中文部分

余玥辰 (2011)。風險認知、先前知識及自我效能對創業意圖之影響-風險態度之中介效果，國立高雄應用科技大學碩士論文。

何思緯 (2010)。影響創業意圖之心理因素實證研究─臺灣與越南學生的比較，國立雲林科技大學碩士論文。

吳亞倫 (2011)。人格特質、社會資本對創業意圖影響之研究 ─創業事件模型觀點，國立雲林科技大學碩士論文 。

宋明鴻 (2010)。大學生特質與創業意向關聯性之研究以創業精神、創業態度為中介變數，國立澎湖科技大學碩士論文。

林明賢 (2005)。內在個人特質與外在環境對創業態度及意圖之影響，國立政治大學碩士論文。

張育菁 (2017)。創業家特質之多個案研究，國立中山大學碩士論文。

許三源 (2011)。高科技產業中階主管創業家特質、知識慣性與創新行為關係之研究-跨界活動觀點，長榮大學碩士論文。

郭志雄 (2017)。創業動機、外在環境與創業能力對創業績效之影響，南臺科技大學碩士論文。

陳建宏 (2009)。創業家人格特質、創業資源、創業策略、社會網絡、外在環境與創業績效之關係研究－以臺灣東、北部地區中小企業創業家為例，國立宜蘭大學碩士論文。

陳彥廷 (2011)。創業家特質、跨界活動對創業績效之實證研究— 以創業自我效能為干擾變項，國立臺南大學碩士論文。

陳基祥 (2013)。創業願景與創業績效之關聯性研究。創業管理研究, 8(3), 57-84。

黃柏仁 (2017)。工作價值觀落差對離職意圖與創業意圖之影響。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文。

黃楓雅 (2005)。創業潛能與創業意圖之關聯性研究。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。

葉千禎 (2009)。影響女性創業意圖因素之研究—以社會網絡為中介變數,國立高雄應用科技大學碩士論文。

劉常勇 (2006)。創業管理研究之回顧與展望: 理論與模式探討。創業管理研究, 第一卷第一期,1-43。

劉建良 (2017)。以計畫行為理論探討中小企業主創業意圖與創業行為之研究。國立高雄應用科技大學碩士論文。

劉德芳 (2006)。以整合性的觀點實證研究女性創業之意向－以「飛雁學員」為例。樹德科技大學碩士論文。

蔡佳良 (2017)。人格特質、創業環境及創業資源對於創業意圖之影響。實踐大學碩士論文。

賴銘娟 (2004)。技職校院商管群學生創業態度及其影響因素之研究。國立雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，雲林。
 
英文部分

Ajzen (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. 

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: a psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Ardichviliand Cardozo, R. N. (2000). A model of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process, Journal of Enterprising Culture, 8(2), 103-119.

Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., and Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business venturing, 18(1), 105-123. 

Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition : how entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new businessopportunities. Acad. Management Perspectives,20(1) , 104–119.

Bibi Sarpinah Sheikh Naimullah Anis and Abang Sulaiman Abang Naim (2017). Do prior knowledge and personal capabilities influence entrepreneurial intentions among science and technology undergraduate student? World Applied Sciences Journal, 35 (8).

Bird (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention.　Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.

Bird (1992). The operation of intentions in time: The emergence of the new venture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(1), 11-20. 

Birley, S. and D. Norburn (1987). Owners and managers:The venture 100 versus the Fortune 500. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(4): 351-363. 

Bowen, D. D., and Hisrich, R. D. (1986). The female entrepreneur: A career development perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 393-407.

Choudhary (2017). Investigating entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Y (Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology).

Craft, J. A. (1988). Human resource management: evolving role and responsibility. Human Resource Planning and Strategy, ASPA.BNA Series. 

Crant M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions.　Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42-49. 

Davis, G. A. (1986). Creativity is forever. Iowa: Kendal/Hunt

Dahalan Jaafar, M., and Rosdi, S. A. M. (2015). Attitude and entrepreneurial intention among rural community: the mediating role of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 18, p. 01005). EDP Sciences.

DeNoble F., Jung, D. and Ehrlich, S. B. (1999). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy:the development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial action, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, in Reynolds P., Bygrave, W., Mason, C., Meyer G., Sapienz A. 

Douglas J. and Shepherd, D. A. (2002). Self-Employment as a Career Choice: Attitudes, Entrepreneurial Intentions, and Utility Maximization,  Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3): 81-90. 

Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceivedenvironmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327. 

Gathungu M., and Baariu, V. L. (2018). Competitive strategies entrepreneurial orientation, external environment and performance of small and medium enterprises in the manufacturing sector in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Journal of Arts and Humanities , 7(9), 22-33. 

Gnyawali, D. R., and Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 43-62.

Harada (2003). Who succeeds as an entrepreneur? An analysis of the post-entry performance of new firms in Japan. Japan and the world Economy, 15(2), 211-222. 

KerrP., Kerr, W. R., and Xu, T. (2018). Personality traits of entrepreneurs: a review of recent literature. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 14(3), 279-356.

Khuong N., and An, N. H. (2016). The factors affecting entrepreneurial intention of the students of Vietnam national university—a mediation analysis of perception toward entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(2), 104-111.

Kinnear C., and Bernhard K. L. (1990). Principles of marketing. Illinois: Scott and Foresman Company. 

Kithusin. N. (2015). Firm resources, external environment,entrepreneurial strategy and performance of micro, small and medium furniture sector enterprises in Nairobi city county, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, School of Business, University of Nairoba). 

Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management, analysis, planning, implementation, and control, Philip Kotler. London: Prentice-Hall International.

Krueger (1993) Entrepreneurial intentions: applying theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 5: 315–330.

Krueger and Carsrud. (2000). The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(3), 5-23.

Kujinga L. (2016). The influence of institutional environmental factors on social entrepreneurial intentions among tertiary-level students in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation).

Learn E. (1992). What happened before the organization? A model of organizational formation entrepreneurshtp theory and practice. 17(1), 39-48.

Lee Y., and Tsang, E. W. K. (2001). The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth, Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), pp. 583.

Lim L., and Xavier, S. R. (2015). Opportunity recognition framework: exploring the technology entrepreneurs. American Journal of economics, 5(2), 105-111.

Lumpkin T., and Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172.

McClelland C. (1976). The achieving society. Ban Nostrand, Princeton, NJ. 

McClelland C., and Burnham, D. H. (1976). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 159-166.

Milovanovic M., and Wittine, Z. (2014). Analysis of external environment's moderating role on the entrepreneurial orientation and business performance relationship among Italian small enterprises. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance.

Miralles Giones, F., and Riverola, C. (2016). Evaluating the impact of prior experience in entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(3), 791-813.

Nguyen, C.  (2017). Entrepreneurial intention of international business students in Viet Nam: a survey of the country joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 7.

Nguyen, C. (2018). Demographic factors, family background and prior self-employment on entrepreneurial intention-Vietnamese business students are different: why?. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8(1), 10. 

Narayanan, V. K. (2001). Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 

Nunnally, J. (1978).Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Nihan Yildirimand Aşkun, O. B. (2016). Ready to dare? A case study on the entrepreneurial intentions of business and engineering students in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 277-288.

Ozaralliand Rivenburgh, N. K. (2016). Entrepreneurial intention: antecedents to entrepreneurial behavior in the USA and Turkey. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 6(1), 3.

Quan (2012). Prior experience, social network, and levels of entrepreneurial intentions. Management Research Review, 35(10), 945-957.

Ratnamiasih and Setia, B. I. （2016). Internal and external factors that influence student entrepreneurship intention on private universities in Bandung. 

Rauch, A., and Frese, M. (2000). Psychological approaches to entrepreneurial success: A general model and overview of findings. In C. L. Cooper & I. T.

Robbins P.（2001). Organizational behavior.Upper saddle river, N.J. : Prentice Hall Stephen. 

Rotter B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: general and applied, 80(1).

Schumpeter A.(1934). The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA:J. 

Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward  Elgar  Publishing.

Shane (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 11(4), 448-469.

Shane and Venkataraman, S., (2000). “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research”, Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.

Shaver G. and Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 23-45.

Shepherd A., and Patzelt, H. (2018). Prior knowledge and entrepreneurial Cognition. In Entrepreneurial Cognition ,7-49,Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 

Sigrist (1999). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition.A presentation at the Annual UIC/AMA symposium at Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, Sofia-Antipolis, France.

Simon H. A. (1986). What we know about the creative process frontiers in creative and innovative management (Ed.). Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.

Sicrec Karin and Mocnik (2010). How entrepreneurs’ personal characteristics affect SMEs’ growth. Nase Gospodarstvo: NG, 2010, 56.1/2: 3.

Stephen Choo and M.Wong (2006). Entrepreneurial intention:triggers and barriers to new venture creations in Singapore. Singapore management review, 28(2), 47-64. 

Stewart (1999). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: a comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 14,189-214.

Timmons A. and Spinelli, S. (2004). New venture creation, 6th ed., Boston: McGraw Hill Inc.

Torrance (1984). Mentor relationships: How they aid creative achievement, endure, change, and die. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.E.P. 

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advance in entrepreneurship,firm emergence and growth:119-138. 

Watson Hogarth-Scott, S., and Wilson, N. (1998). Small business start-ups: success factors and support implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 4(3), 217-238.

WeiLee Lim (2014). Pior knowledge, social capital and entrepreneurial intentions: entrepreneurial alertness as mediator, Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 2(1), 68-78.

Wood E., and Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social.

Zahra A., and Neubaum, D. O. (1998). Environmental adversity and the entrepreneurial activities of new ventures. Journal of developmental entrepreneurship, 3(2), 123.

Zhang Duysters, G., and Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university tudents’ entrepreneurial intention. International entrepreneurship and management journal, 10(3), 623-641.
 
網路部分
Amway Global Entrepreneurship Report (AGER)2018, 檢索於2018/11/10，取自：https://www.amwayglobal.com/amway-global-entrepreneurship-report-2018-examines-intrinsic-extrinsic-aspects-entrepreneurship-risk-finances-obstacles-personal-service-valued-digital/

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) 2017 / 2018 GLOBAL REPORT,檢索於2018/11/10，取自：
https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/50012

Mai Phương (2018). Ty le khoi nghiep cua TpHCM đang tang. Bao Thanh Nien，檢索於2018/10/10，取自：
https://thanhnien.vn/tai-chinh-kinh-doanh/ty-le-khoi-nghiep-cua-tphcm-dang-tang-944222.html

Vien Thong (2018). 82％dan IT nung nau y dinh khoi nghiep.VneExpress, 檢索於2018/10/10，取自：
https://kinhdoanh.vnexpress.net/tin-tuc/startup/82-dan-it-nung-nau-y-dinh-khoi-nghiep-3799632.html 

王稚慧 (2018)。臺灣新創企業真的只有1%存活率？中華微信所網站。中華微信所，檢索於2018/10/10，取自：
http://www.credit.com.tw/creditonline/Epaper/ThemeContent.aspx?sn=18andunit=431

中央社 (2018)。WEF東協峰會座談會談第4次工業革命與創業。美麗日報，檢索於2018/09/20，取自：
http://m.bldaily.com/southeast-asia/southeast-asian-nations/p-275515.html

新華網 (2018)。最新調查顯示：逾七成臺灣青年創業意願高。檢索於2018/10/10，取自：
http://www.xinhuanet.com/2018-06/21/c_1123016969.htm

越南計劃和投資部，檢索於2018/11/10
	https://dangkykinhdoanh.gov.vn/vn/Pages/Trangchu.aspx