在科技高速發展的21世紀，越來越多科技產品出現在世人的面前，電腦，網路，移動電子設備等科技產品不斷地產生並不斷地更新，同樣隨著科技的發展，教育科技領域也不斷壯大，研究者們也在不斷地實驗與研究，試圖把更多的科技產品融入到教育之中。近年來虛擬實境的發展也成為教育科學領域的發展方向之一，也有越來越多的虛擬實境融入教學的實例。因此本研究想針對虛擬實境融入真實的教育環境進行探討，根據【實驗室】虛擬實境軟體在教育環境下的實際應用，評估其使用性狀況如何，在真實的情境中遇到了哪些使用性問題，並針對面對的使用性問題提出修改意見和建議。本研究研究對象以北部某大學大學部及研究生為主，以立意抽樣的方式，邀請8位元大學生並採用­­­ Valve開發的虛擬實境遊戲【實驗室】軟體進行實驗。研究工具為HTC VIVE，使用者使用性任務清單，訪談大綱，Morae 影像測錄軟體，ITC SOPI 問卷。透過以上資料收集手段，探討虛擬實境在教育環境中的使用性問題。問卷分析結果顯示【實驗室】虛擬實境軟體讓使用者有強烈的空間存在感，使用者參與程度高，課程真實程度高，但也伴隨些許負面的身體影響。本研究結果欲提供未來使用虛擬實境結合教育內容之使用性評估之參考。

In the 21st century with the rapid development of science and technology, more and more technology products are appearing in front of the world. Computers, networks, mobile electronic devices and other technology products are continuously produced and constantly updated. Along with the development of science and technology, the field of educational technology is also growing continuously, researchers are constantly experimenting and researching, trying to integrate more technological products into education. In recent years, the development of virtual reality has also become one of the development directions in the field of education science. There are also more and more examples of virtual reality being integrated into teaching. Therefore, this study intends to explore the integration of virtual reality into the real education environment. According to the actual application of the virtual reality software in the educational environment, how to assess its usability and what use it has encountered in real situations? Problems and suggestions for modification in the face of usability problems. The research object of this study is the university department and graduate student of a university in the northern part of the country. In an intentional sampling manner, it invites 8 university students and uses Valve's virtual reality game [The Lab] software to conduct experiments. The research tools are HTC VIVE, user task list, interview outline, Morae video software, and ITC SOPI questionnaire. Through the above data collection methods, the use of virtual reality in the education environment is discussed. Questionnaire analysis results show that [The Lab] virtual reality software allows users to have a strong sense of spatial presence, high level of user involvement, and a high degree of authenticity of the course, but also with some negative physical effects. The results of this study are intended to provide a reference for the future use of virtual reality in conjunction with the evaluation of the use of educational content.

目次

中文摘要............................................................i
英文摘要............................................................ii
目次  ..............................................................iii
表次  ...............................................................v
图次 ...............................................................vi
第一章 绪论 ........................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機...........................................1
第二節 研究目的與問題 ..........................................4
第三節 重要名詞釋義 ............................................5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 ..........................................6
第五節 研究貢獻 ................................................7
第二章 文獻探討 ....................................................8
第一節 虛擬實境 ................................................8
第二節 介面設計 ...............................................20
第三節 使用性評估 .............................................22
第三章 研究方法 ...................................................28
第一節 研究流程 ...............................................28
第二節 研究方法 ...............................................29
第三節 研究對象 ...............................................30
第四節 研究工具 ...............................................30
第五節資料分析與處理 ..........................................40
第四章 研究結果 ...................................................41
第一節 使用性结果分析 .........................................41
第二節 使用性问题分析 .........................................45
第三節 使用性建议 .............................................45
第四節 小结 ...................................................47
第五章 結論與建議 .................................................48
第一節 使用性结果分析 .........................................48
第二節 使用性问题分析 .........................................51
參考文獻 ..........................................................52
附錄一 個人資料問卷 ...............................................55
附錄二 觀察記錄表 .................................................57
附錄三 ITC SOPI 問卷 ...............................................59 

表次
表2-3-1 使用性評估方法（檢視） .....................................24
表2-3-2 使用性評估方法（測試） .....................................25
表2-3-3 使用性評估方法（調查） .....................................26
表3-4-1虛擬實境融入自然課程教學設計 ...............................33
表3-4-2 使用者使用性任務清單 .......................................35
表3-4-3 Morae影像測錄軟體功能介紹 .................................36
表3-4-4 ITC SOPI系統使用性量表 ......................................38
表4-1-1  ITC SOPI 受試者基本資料  ....................................41
表4-1-2  ITC SOPI 受試者四個面項分析  ................................42
表4-1-3  ITC SOPI 受試者虛擬實境經驗因素分析  ........................42
表4-1-4  ITC SOPI 受試者性別因素分析  ................................43 
表4-1-5  受試者工作任務觀察記錄分析  ................................43

圖次
圖2-1-1 戴爾經驗金字塔 .............................................11
圖2-1-2 虛擬實境三角形 .............................................12
圖2-1-3 虛擬實境PC型裝置 .........................................13
圖2-1-4 虛擬實境一體式裝置 .........................................13
圖2-1-5 虛擬實境移動式裝置 .........................................14
圖2-1-6 The Lab 主介面 .............................................14
圖2-1-7 The Lab 選單介面 ...........................................15
圖2-1-8 The Lab彈弓VR教材介面 ....................................15
圖2-1-9 The Lab 長弓VR教材介面 ....................................16
圖2-1-10 The Lab Xortex VR教材介面 ..................................16
圖2-1-11 The Lab 明信片VR教材介面 .................................17
圖2-1-12 The Lab 人類身體檢測VR教材介面 ...........................17
圖2-1-13 The Lab 修理機器人VR教材介面 .............................18
圖2-1-14 The Lab 秘密商店VR教材介面 ...............................18
圖3-1-1 研究流程 ...................................................29
圖3-4-1 The Lab 太陽系VR教材介面 ..................................31
圖3-4-2 The Lab 太陽系VR教材介面 ..................................31
圖3-4-3 The Lab 太陽系VR教材介面 ..................................32
圖3-4-4 The Lab 太陽系VR教材介面 ..................................32
圖3-4-5 HTC VIVE實景圖 ............................................37

參考文獻

中文部分：
李世忠，何政興，（1998）。電腦教學軟體介面設計。台北：立威。
黃柏阡（2015）。遊戲式物理學習APP之使用效能研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台北。
衛惠瑜（2014）。以使用者測試觀點探討國中電子教科書使用性評估之研究-以數學科為例。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台北。
朱浩平（2015）。MOOCs網站使用性評估之研究-眼動資料探討。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台北。
劉子晏（2015）。數為平台使用性評估之研究-以教育部數位學習服務平台為例。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台北。
魏澤群（2007）。優使性2.0（Usability2.0）網站經驗設計與使用者研究。臺北：網奕資訊。
夏崇舜、楊育芳（2009）。多媒體教學在外語習上的應用：以虛擬實境軟體為例。明新學報，35(1) ，157 -167 。
翁東東（2016）。虛擬實境暈動症產生機理與對策。
  https://www.shenzhenware.com/articles/10705
梁炎新（2016）。基於VR技術的自選宿舍漫遊系統的研究。《电脑迷》 ,  2016 (4)。
詹秦川、弓宸 (2014)。 虚拟现实技术的应用及发展现状分析。 产业与科技论坛(7), 75-76。
游佳萍（2004）。虛擬群組互動學習行為與群組認同感之探討。2004電子商務與數位生活研討會論文集，16頁。
徐易稜（2001）。多媒體呈現方式對學習者認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究。國立中央大學資訊管理碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台北。


英文部分：
Abran A., Khelifi A., & Suryn W., Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Software Quality Journal, 11, 325–338, 2003  
Bell B., Using programming walkthroughs to design a visual language. Technical Report CU-CS-581-92 (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO., 1992. 
Bevan N. & Macleod M., Usability measurement in context. Behaviour and Information Technology, 13, 132–145, 1994 
Bevan N., Kirakowski J. & Maissel J., What is usability? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on HCI, 651–655, 1991 
Bias R., "The Pluralistic Usability Walkthrough: Coordinated Empathies," in Nielsen, Jakob, and Mack, R. eds, Usability Inspection Methods. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1994. 
Blackmon, Polson M. H., Muneo P. G., Kitajima M. & Lewis C., Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web CHI 2002 vol.4 No.1, 2002 
Cai, Y., Lu, B., Zheng, J. & Li, L. (2006). Immersive protein gaming for bio edutainment. Simulation & Gaming, 37(4), 466-475.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
Donyaee M. and Seffah A. , QUIM: An Integrated Model for Specifying and Measuring Quality in Use, Eighth IFIP Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan, 2001 
Dumas J. S. and Redish J. C., A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, 1993. 
Day, R; Payne, L. "Computer-managed instruction: an alternative teaching strategy.". J Nurs Educ. 26: 30–6. PMID 3029349.
D. Randy Garrison; Terry Anderson; Definitions and Terminology Committee (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-26346-8.
Hartson H., Remote Evaluation: The Network as an Extension of the Usability Laboratory, in CHI96 Conference Proceedings. 
Holzinger A., Usability engineering methods for software developers. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 71–74, January 2005 
Hof, R. (2015). Forbes Welcome. Forbes.com. Retrieved 16 October 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthof/2015/12/23/googles-cardboard-will-bring-vr-and-vr-ads-to-the-masses/#160f6bc238a6
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology, IEEE std. 610.12-1990. Los Alamitos, CA: Author, 1990 
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-11:1998, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva, Switzerland: Author, 1998 
International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, Software engineering, product quality, Part 1: Quality model. Geneva, Switzerland: Author, 2001  
Jesse James Garrett’s The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond (2nd Edition).
Metz, C., Metz, C., Simonite, T., Finley, K., Simonite, T., & Finley, K. et al. (2015).The Inside Story of Google's Bizarre Plunge Into VR. WIRED. Retrieved 16 October 2017, from https://www.wired.com/2015/06/inside-story-googles-unlikely-leap-cardboard-vr/
Nielsen, J.(1993). Usability Engineering, New York: AP Professional, 17-156.
Olshannikova, E., Ometov, A., Koucheryavy, Y., & Olsson, T. (2015). Visualizing Big Data with augmented and virtual reality: challenges and research agenda. Retrieved 14 October 2017, from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-015-0031-2
Richey, R.C. (2008). "Reflections on the 2008 AECT Definitions of the Field". TechTrends. 52 (1): 24–25. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0108-2.
Selwyn, N. (2011) Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Sapp, C. (2015). How Virtual Reality Can Close Learning Gaps in Your Classroom - EdSurge News. EdSurge. Retrieved 14 October 2017, from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-09-07-how-virtual-reality-can-close-learning-gaps-in-your-classroom