淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-0207200710164100
中文論文名稱 信用利差分解及其對風險分散之意義
英文論文名稱 Credit Spread Decomposition and Implications on Diversification
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 財務金融學系博士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Banking and Finance
學年度 95
學期 2
出版年 96
研究生中文姓名 孫效孔
研究生英文姓名 David Shaokung Sun
學號 892490052
學位類別 博士
語文別 英文
第二語文別 中文
口試日期 2007-06-26
論文頁數 91頁
口試委員 指導教授-林蒼祥
委員-薛琦
委員-胡宜仁
委員-聶建中
委員-許和鈞
委員-郭憲章
委員-古永嘉
委員-林蒼祥
中文關鍵字 信用風險  公司債  信用利差  業務特性利差  自我迴歸分配性落階模型 
英文關鍵字 Credit risk  Credit spread  Idiosyncratic credit spread  Diversification  ARDL 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學商學
中文摘要 本論文之動機,在於了解公司債信用利差(corporate credit spread)之組成特質,如何藉由對信用利差之分解,改善在長期間信用風險之分散成效。經由對信用利差中受總體經濟變數影響的市場利差(market spread),以及對受信用等級或產業因素影響之業務特性利差(idiosyncratic spread)之差異分析,了解利差之分解在公司債投資組合風險分散上之意義。本論文之研究方向與Fama(1986)相吻合,該研究提出違約風險溢酬(default premium)在長期間之重要性,相對於期限溢酬(term premium)在傳統流動性偏好假說上之推論,違約風險溢酬或信用利差具有對經濟衰退徵兆之高敏感性,特別是高收益公司債之利差較投資級公司債對衰退有更高之預測能力,亦即不同信用評等下信用利差應以不同方式看待。目前學理或實務上均採用同一模型分析不同信用等級公司債之信用利差,對業務特性利差長期中的差別效果不易分辨。因此本論文之研究目的,在於找出將信用利差分解為市場利差與業務特性利差之方法,並提供實證研究上之根據以及應考慮之相關因素。根據公司債之可分散信用風險(diversifiable credit risk)之理論,本論文提出實證上簡易可靠之風險分解方法。並且在資料檢驗中證明,只有信用利差中之市場利差以外之部份,方為衡量個別公司債信用風險之重點。管理公司債組合時,為調整組合權重之主要參考,亦是個別公司債定價差異之主要來源。依傳統沿用完整之信用利差作為風險分散或差別定價之基礎,將會產生風險配置上之扭曲,此乃本論文最主要精神。本論文之貢獻,在學理上驗證了業務特性信用利差之重要性、提供了對其做具體估計之方法、以其預測信用風險之可行方法、提出其在景氣循環中之非對稱特性,以及應用於個別公司債時適用之計量模型。在實務上對公司債組合之風險分散提供風險配置之準則,並以業務特性信用利差作為各信用等級公司債之訂價之基礎。由於對股票投資組合之風險分散技巧,並無法全然應用於固定收益組合上,因此本論文將使公司債組合中之風險分散更為精確,更有效率地反映公司債市場之風險報酬特性。
本論文對信用利差分解之分析,反映了對公司債各風險因素作正確風險補償之重要性,亦彌補了傳統結構式模型對信用利差估計之缺陷。對於信用利差中系統與個別風險之區隔,與股票價格模型在精神上相似,卻須以幾乎完全不同之方法分析。更精確完善之利差分解,將可應用於更廣泛之固定收益證券及其組合。對世界各先進國家以及我國之資本市場而言,可發揮擴大並促進資本市場有效配置之影響。
英文摘要 The motivation of this dissertation is to explore the characteristics of components of corporate credit spreads and how to improve long run credit risk diversification through the decomposition of credit spreads. Specifically, the implications for risk allocation in holding bond portfolio by decomposing credit spread into a market spread and an idiosyncratic component respectively. The former is driven by macroeconomic variables and the latter is related to credit rating or industry factors. This motivation is also in the spirit of Fama (1986), which argued against the traditional preferred habitat hypothesis of term structure stressing a more important role of default premium than that of term premium in predicting economic recession. His findings of a stronger effect from the high-yield issues than the investment grade ones suggest the need to differentiate how we look at credit risks across different credit ratings or firms. Currently credit spreads of different credit ratings are analyzed without distinguishing between general fixed income market risks and credit rating or idiosyncratic credit risks. So the purpose of this thesis is specifically to identify diversifiable risks by way of decomposing yield spreads of fixed income into systematic and idiosyncratic spreads. This dissertation proposes a practically simple decomposition scheme based on relevant theories and verify its validity through series of solid empirical examinations. Methodology in this dissertation provides a tractable way of measuring diversifiable risks which is crucial for portfolio composition and related adjustments. The ability of idiosyncratic spread to predict future defaults is another contribution. The asymmetric adjustment of credit spread suggests the very drawback of conventional structural model of credit spreads. The applicability of decomposition on individual corporate credit spreads is of substantial importance as well. To the extent that diversification technique in equity portfolio does not apply well to fixed income portfolios, this dissertation provides a solution to more accurately diversify bond portfolio risks and reflect efficiently the risk-return characteristics of corporate liabilities.
The analysis of credit spread decomposition in this dissertation reflects the importance of proper risk compensation in corporate bond pricing. It provides a remedy to inconsistencies exhibited in estimates from the conventional structural approach. Although the identification of non-systematic risk within credit spread is similar in spirit to that in equity pricing, methods of entirely different nature have to be adopted. Decomposition conducted with more accuracy could be applied extensively in fixed income securities and their portfolios. Efficient allocation of risks in the market can be extended within the capital markets of developed economy as well as that in Taiwan.
論文目次 Table of Contents

Acknowledgements ... ii
Chinese Abstract ... iii
English Abstract... v
Table of Contents ... vii
List of Tables ... ix
List of Figures ... x
Chapter 1 Introduction ... 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review ... 4
2.1 Literatures on Credit Spread Models ... 4
2.1.1 Structural Models ... 4
2.1.2 Reduced-Form Models ... 6
2.2 Literatures on Barrier Option Models ... 8
Chapter 3 Models and Data ... 10
3.1 Models ... 10
3.1.1 Affine Term Structure Model ... 10
3.1.2 ARDL Cointegration Analysis ...11
3.1.3 Hybrid Barrier Option Model of Credit Spread ... 13
3.1.4 Pooled Mean Group ARDL Model ... 14
3.2 Data ... 14
Chapter 4 Long Run Diversification: Empirical Decomposition of Credit Spreads ... 18
4.1 Introduction ... 18
4.2 An Affine Model of Credit Spreads ... 21
4.3 Preliminary analysis ... 26
4.4 Empirical decomposition of credit spreads ... 29
4.4.1 Problems of using credit spread changes ... 31
4.4.2 Long-run analysis with cointegration ... 32
4.4.3 ARDL-ECM, long and short run estimates ... 37
4.4.4 ARDL-ECM for the general decomposition model ... 40
4.5 Informational content of idiosyncratic credit spread ... 45
4.6 Related issues and discussions ... 47
4.6.1 Alternative credit spread measures ... 47
4.6.2 Other Control Variables ... 48
4.6.3 Causality among yield spreads ... 49
4.6.4 Persistence of yield spreads ... 49
4.7 Chapter Conclusion ... 50
5.1 Introduction ... 52
5.2 A hybrid barrier option framework of credit spreads ... 55
5.3 Empirical Analysis ... 61
5.4 Related issues and discussions ... 67
5.4.1 Alternative cointegration equation ... 67
5.4.2 High yield bonds ... 68
5.4.3 Individual bond issues ... 68
5.5 Chapter Conclusion ... 69
Chapter 6 Corporate Bond Spread Decomposition and Diversification: A Pooled Estimation on
Heterogeneous Panels ... 71
6.1 Introduction ... 71
6.2 A Model for Systematic and Idiosyncratic Credit Spreads ... 74
viii
6.3 Empirical decomposition of credit spreads ... 75
6.3.1 Preliminary Pooled Estimation of a Baseline Model ... 75
6.3.2 Estimating Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels with ARDL-PMG ... 77
6.3.3 PMG estimations for long and short run ... 78
6.3.4 ARDL-PMG estimations for the general decomposition model ... 83
6.4 Chapter Conclusion ... 86
Chapter 7: Conclusion ... 88
References ... 89


List of Tables

Table 1 Summary Statistics of Yield Spreads ... 15
Table 2 Summary Statistics of Weekly Yield Spreads of the Most Active Taiwan Corporate Bonds ... 17
Table 3 Structural-Change Estimation Results of the Baseline Model (Bai-Perron procedure) ... 28
Table 4 Cointegration Test Comparisons, Johansen Maximum Likelihood Rank Test VS PSS ARDL Variable Addition Test and ARDL-ECM t-test ... 35
Table 5 Autoregressive Distributed Lag Estimation-Error Correction Model Estimation Results, Weekly Data ... 38
Table 6 Autoregressive Distributed Lag Estimation-Error Correction Model Estimation Results, Weekly Data ... 41
Table 7 Comparisons of ARDL Results for Idiosyncratic Credit Spreads from Alternative Decomposition Schemes ... 43
Table 8 Informational Content of Credit Spreads about Bond Defaults ... 46
Table 9 Cointegration and Asymmetric Adjustment Estimations on Credit Spreads, Monthly Data ... 64
Table 10 Cointegration and Asymmetric Adjustment Estimations on Credit Spreads, Weekly Data ... 65
Table 11 Panel Estimations on Individual Corporate Credit Spreads, Baseline Model ... 76
Table 12 Pooled Mean Group (PMG) Estimations for Corporate Credit Spreads of Rating Groups ... 82
Table 13 PMG Results for Idiosyncratic Spreads under Alternative Decomposition Schemes ... 85


List of Figures

Figure 1 ... 57
Figure 2 ... 60
Figure 3 ... 66
參考文獻 References

Bai, J., and P. Perron, 2003, Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1-22.
Barnhill, T. M. Jr., F. L, Joutz and W. F. Maxwell, 2000, Factors affecting the yields on noninvestment grade bond indices: a cointegration analysis, Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 57-86.
Black F., and M. Scholes, 1973, The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654.
Broadie M., and M. Chernov and S. Sundaresan, 2007, Optimal debt and equity values in the presence of Chapter 7 and Chapter 11, Journal of Finance, 62, 1341-1377.
Brockman P., and H. J. Turtle, 2003, A barrier option framework for corporate security valuation, Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 511-529.
Brown, R.L., J. Durbin, and J.M. Evans, 1975, Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time (with discussion) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B37, 149-192.
Campbell, J. Y., and G. B. Tasker, 2003, Measuring corporate bond mortality and performance, Journal of Finance, 58, 2321-2349.
Chen, L., P. Collin-Dufresne and R. S. Goldstein, 2006, On the relation between the credit spread puzzle and the equity premium puzzle, Working Paper, Social Science Research Network
Chen, L., D. Lesmond and J. Wei, 2007, Corporate yield spreads and bond liquidity, Journal of Finance, 62, 119-149.
Collin-Dufresne, P., R. Goldstein and J. Helwege (2003), Is credit event risk priced? Modeling contagion via the updating of beliefs, Working Paper, Haas School, University of California, Berkeley
Collin-Dufresne, P., R. S. Goldstein, and J. S. Martin, 2001, The determinants of credit spread changes, Journal of Finance, 56, 2177-2207.
Duffee, G. R., 1998, The relation between treasury yields and corporate bond yield spreads, Journal of Finance, 56, 2177-2207.
Duffee, G. R., 1999, Estimating the price of default risk, Review of Financial Studies, 12, 197-226.
Duffie, D., and R. Kan (1996), A yield-factor model of interest rates, Mathematical Finance, 6, 379-406.
Duffie, D., and K. Singleton, 1997, An econometric model of the term structure of interest-rate swap yields, Journal of Finance, 52, 1287-1321.
Duffie, D., and K. Singleton, 1999, Modeling term Structure of defaultable bonds, Review of Financial Studies, 12, 687-720.
Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber., D. Agrawal, and C. Mann, 2001, Explaining the rate spread on corporate bonds, Journal of Finance, 56, 247-277.
Enders, W., and C. W. J. Granger, 1998, Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16, 204-311.
Enders, W., and P. L. Siklos, 2001, Cointegration and threshold adjustment, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19, 166-176.
Engle, R. F., and Granger, C. W. J., 1987, Cointegration and error Correction: Representation, estimation, and testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 254-276.
Fama, E. F., 1986, Term premiums and default premiums in money markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 175-196
Gatfaoui, H., 2003, Risk disaggregation and credit risk valuation in a Merton framework, Journal of Risk, 4, n3, 27-42
Geske, R. L. and G. Delianedis. The components of corporate credit spreads: default, recovery, taxes, jumps, liquidity, and market factors. Working Paper, UCLA, 2003.
Giesecke, K., 2004, Credit risk modeling and valuation: An introduction, Journal of Financial Risk Management, 2(1), 1-40
Giesecke, K. and L. Goldberg, 2005, The market price of credit risk, Working Paper, Cornell University.
Granger, C. W. J., 1969, Investigating causal relations by econometric methods and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica, 34, 424-438.
Huang, J. Z., and M. Huang, 2003, How much of the corporate-treasury yield spread is due to credit risk, Working Paper, Penn State and Stanford Universities.
Jarrow, R. A., D. Lando, and F. Yu, 2003, Default risk and diversification: theory and applications, Working Paper, Cornell University.
Jarrow, R. A., and S. Turnbull, 1995, Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk, Journal of Finance, 50, 53-86.
Jarrow, R. A., and S. Turnbull, 2000, The interception of market and credit risk, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 271-299.
Johansen, S., 1988, Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors and dynamics and control, Journal of Econometrics, 12, 231-254
Johansen, S., and K. Juselius, 1990, Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with applications to the demand for money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210
Johansen, S., 1994, The role of the constant and linear terms in cointegration analysis of nonstationary variables, Econometric Review, 13(2), 205-229
Joutz, F. L, S. A. Mansi and W. F. Maxwell, 2001, The dynamics of corporate credit spreads, Working Paper, George Washington University and Texas Tech University.
Leland, H. E., 1994, Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure, Journal of Finance, 49, 987-1019.
Leland, H. E., 2004, Predictions of default probabilities in structural models of debt, Journal of Investment Management, 2(2), 5–20.
Leland, H., and K. Toft, 1996, Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads, Journal of Finance 51, 987-1019.
Liu, J, Longstaff, F.A. and R.E. Mandell, 2006, The market price of risk in interest rate swaps: the roles of default and liquidity risks. Journal of Business, 79, 1, 2337-2359.
Lin, W., and D. Sun, 2007, Diversification with idiosyncratic credit spreads: A pooled estimation on heterogeneous panels, Taiwan Financial Research Quarterly, 8(2), 1-28.
Longstaff, F. A., and E. Schwartz, 1995, A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and floating rate debt, Journal of Finance, 50, 789-821.
Merton, R. C., 1974, On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates, Journal of Finance, 29, 449-470.
Neal, R., D. Rolph, and C. Morris, 2000, Interest rates and credit spread dynamics, Working Paper, Indiana University, University of Washington, and Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
Pedrosa, M., and R. Roll, 1998, Systematic risk in corporate bond credit spreads, Journal of Fixed Income, 8, 7-26.
Pesaran, M. H., and B. Pesaran (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pesaran, M. H., Y. Shin, and R.P. Smith, 1999, Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.
Pesaran, M. H., Y. Shin, and R. J. Smith, 2001, Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long-run relationship, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.
Pesaran, M. H., and R. J. Smith (1998), Structural analysis of cointegrating VARs, Journal of Economic Survey 12(5): 471-505.
Saunders, A., A. Srinivasan, and I. Walter, 2002, Price formation in the OTC corporate bond markets: a field study of the inter-dealer market, Journal of Economics and Business, 54, 95-113.
Standard & Poor's 2006 Corporate Ratings Criteria, 2006, Ratings and ratios: ratio medians, Standard & Poor’s.
Sun, D, W. Lin and C. Nieh, 2007, Long run credit risk diversification: empirical decomposition of corporate credit spreads, Review of Securities and Futures Markets, forthcoming.
Wilson, T. C., 1998, Portfolio credit risk, FEBNY Economic Policy Review, 71-82
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2012-07-10公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2012-07-10起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信