§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-0108200612493700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2006.00010
論文名稱(中文) 規範銀行產業經營之BaselⅡ的三大支柱之整合分析
論文名稱(英文) An Integrated Analysis of Regulating Banking Industry of Three Pillars of BaselⅡ
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 產業經濟學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Industrial Economics
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 94
學期 2
出版年 95
研究生(中文) 王昭偉
研究生(英文) Chau-Wei Wang
學號 693510272
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2006-07-21
論文頁數 126頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 蕭峯雄(tbrx@mail.tku.edu.tw)
共同指導教授 - 沈中華(chshen@nccu.edu.tw)
委員 - 黃台心
委員 - 韋伯韜
委員 - 蕭明福
委員 - 蕭峯雄(tbrx@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 沈中華
關鍵字(中) 新巴塞爾資本協定
銀行產業
最低資本要求
監理覆審
市場紀律
隨機稽查
信用風險值
關鍵字(英) BaselⅡ
banking industry
minimum capital requirements
supervisory review process
market discipline
stochastic auditing
credit value at risk
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
在國際金融風潮下,金融自由化、國際化及科技化之盛行,使得銀行競爭日益激烈,面臨之風險更是與日遽增。銀行產業之首要課題,即是有效管理風險、提升資產品質,以強化銀行競爭力。

    國際清算銀行(BIS)所屬之巴塞爾銀行監理委員會(Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, BCBS)於2004年6月26日頒佈了最新之資本國際規範,通稱「新巴塞爾資本協定」(International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards),簡稱BaselⅡ。協定包含三大支柱,第一支柱「最低資本要求」提供衡量信用風險、作業風險,及市場風險等三種風險衡量方法;第二支柱「監理覆審」提示監理機關監管銀行之審查程序與原則;第三支柱「市場紀律」規範銀行之資訊揭露以受市場制裁。

    本論文首先分析三大支柱之核心意涵,再以推理法研究BaselⅡ之整合性經濟意涵。研究結果顯示,若監管單位對銀行經營風險之監管行動(第二支柱)與市場紀律要求(第三支柱),其規範落實良好,則監管單位可有效酌降銀行之最低資本比率(第一支柱)。亦即,規範銀行產業經營之BaselⅡ的第二支柱與第三支柱為互補增強,而其與第一支柱則彼此互為替代。

    本文另補充監管機關隨機稽查銀行與信用風險值(CVaR)管制之推理分析。本文之重要發現為,監管機關對不誠實、謊報資訊之銀行,應要求提列較高之最低資本比率,此論証是其他文獻所無,為獨創性之研究;同時,CVaR管制會導致銀行信用配給,此透過信用管道緊縮貨幣政策後,將降低社會福利。
英文摘要
Under the agitation of the international finance, the prevailing of financial liberalization, internationalization and technicalization makes the banking competition much more fierce, the risks faced by banks are increasingly enhanced even more. The primary subject of the banking industry, namely managing the risk, and improving the quality of the assets effectively, is attempted to strengthen the banking competitiveness. 
    
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision(BCBS), which belongs to the Bank For International Settlements(BIS), issued the latest international norm of capital on June 26 , 2004, generally called the “New Basel Capital Accord”(International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards ), abbreviated as BaselⅡ.This accord includes three major pillars .The first pillar-Minimum Capital Requirements, offers the methods of measuring three kinds of risks, such as credit risk, operational risk, and market risk. The second pillar-Supervisory Review Process, provides the procedures and principles of inspection for the supervisors. The third pillar-Market Discipline, regulates the disclosure principles for banks to face the disciplinary sanctions of markets.

    This paper first analyzes the core meanings of the three pillars, then set up a general model to investigate the integrated meanings of BaselⅡ.The result of the study shows that if the supervisor’s supervision actions (the second pillar) and market discipline requirements(the third pillar) for banks are regulated well, the minimum capital requirements ratio(the first pillar) may be lower. Namely, it implys that the second pillar and the third pillar of BaselⅡ strengthen complementarily, but become substitutes with the first pillar.

    The paper also makes an additional remarks on the regulation effects of stochastic auditing of supervisors and the credit value at risk(CVaR). The result of the study shows that the supervisor should require the higher minimum capital ratio for dishonest banks. Meanwhile, CVaR regulation causes credit rationing of banks, which tightens the monetary policy through the credit channel , and reduces the social welfare.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄

第一章	導論1
第一節	研究目的                                                            1
第二節	研究方法                                                            2
第三節	研究內容與架構                                                      3
第二章	規範銀行產業經營之BaselⅡ的三大支柱之核心意涵分析5
第一節	前言:由BaselⅠ到BaselⅡ之必要性分析                                 5
第二節	BaselⅡ第一支柱「最低資本要求」之信用風險分析                         8
第三節	BaselⅡ第一支柱「最低資本要求」之作業風險分析                        18
第四節	BaselⅡ第一支柱「最低資本要求」之市場風險分析                        21
第五節	BaselⅡ第一支柱「最低資本要求」之信用風險移轉分析:資產證券化         24
第六節	BaselⅡ第二支柱「監理覆審」之核心意涵分析                            29
第七節	BaselⅡ第三支柱「市場紀律」之核心意涵分析                           32
第八節	結論:BaselⅡ三大支柱核心意涵之評論                                 33
※	本章註釋                                                               34
※	本章參考文獻                                                           36
第三章	規範銀行產業經營之BaselⅡ的三大支柱之整合分析37
第一節	前言:文獻回顧                                                     37
第二節	BaselⅡ三大支柱之學術文獻評論                                        38                   
第三節	銀行經營發生shirking現象(懈怠監管弊端)與倒閉之分析                  39
第四節	規範銀行最低資本比率要求之必要性                                   45
第五節	銀行藉由發行附屬債券,經營需受「市場粹煉」評價之分析               48
第六節	規範銀行經營之市場紀律與監管政策之關係                             52
第七節	銀行淨社會價值受監管單位查核成本之影響                             54
第八節	結論:主要發現與政策意涵                                           55
※	本章註釋                                                               58
※	本章參考文獻                                                           64
第四章	在監管機構隨機稽查銀行經營下,銀行最適自有資本比率之決定模型分析70
第一節	前言:由美國金融弊案史談監管稽核之必要性                           70
第二節	監管機構隨機稽查銀行經營狀況之理論模型                             72
第三節	在監管機構隨機稽查銀行經營下,銀行之最適自有資本比率的決定         76
第四節	結論:主要發現與政策意涵                                           77
※	本章註釋                                                               79
※	本章參考文獻                                                           80
第五章	BaselⅡ之信用風險值(CVaR)管制規範下之信用配給分析81
第一節	前言:文獻回顧                                                      81
第二節	銀行之借貸市場模型分析                                             82
第三節	CVaR信用風險管制下之社會福利分析                                  88
第四節	結論:主要發現與政策意涵                                           92
※ 本章註釋                                                               93
※ 本章參考文獻                                                           96
第六章 本文結論98
第一節 本文主要發現                                                       98
第二節 本文政策性與應用性意涵                                             99
第三節	 本文可進一步研究之方向                                            100
※ 本章參考文獻                                                          102
本文參考文獻                                                                 103
附錄 BaselⅡ對銀行經營之市場風險的五種衡量方法                              112
※ 附錄註釋                                                              125
    ※ 附錄參考文獻                                                          126
表目錄
表2-1  新巴塞爾資本協定組織架構                                                8
表2-2  外部信用評等與風險權數之彙整                                           11
表2-3  作業風險之分類與內涵                                                   18
表2-4  營業項目的B 因子                                                       20
表2-5  信用債務之風險權數因子                                                 22
圖目錄
圖1-1  本碩士論文之研究架構流程圖                                             4
圖2-1  標準法下法定資本之計算過程                                            10
圖3-1  銀行之社會價值,內含清算之實質賣出選擇權                              42
圖3-2  1.銀行股東權益淨值E與銀行資產價值A之關係                            
               2.銀行經營之shirking 現象                                              45
圖3-3  金管單位為防止銀行shirking,查核銀行資產之門檻值AL 與
清算銀行資產之門檻值AR ,兩者之組合關係                               53
圖4-1  銀行自籌資本比率k(p) 函數,為銀行貸放投資失敗機率p之增函數            73
圖4-2  銀行貸放投資失敗之損失函數,為銀行自籌資本額k(p) 之減函數,
        以及為銀行貸放投資失敗機率p之增函數                                  74
圖5-1  銀行借貸市場均衡                                                       87
圖5-2  銀行貸款市場與CVaR信用風險管制                                       89
圖5-3  CVaR管制下之存款市場                                                  91
參考文獻
英文文獻
1.	Bank for International Settlements(BIS), 1988,“International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards.”Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel Committee Publications, no. 4. July. Basel, Switzerland.
2.	—, 1999,“A New Capital Adequacy Framework.”Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, June. Basel, Switzerland.
3.	—, 2001,“The New Basel Capital Accord.”Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Second Consultative Paper. January. Basel, Switzerland.
4.	—, 2003,“The New Basel Capital Accord.”Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Third Consultative Paper, April. Basel, Switzerland. Available at 
< http://www.bis.org/bcbs/bcbsp3.htm >
5.  Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 1999,“Capital Requirements and Bank Behavior: The Impact of the Basel Accord”, Working Papers, no.1,BIS.
6.	Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2004,International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards:A Revised Framework, Bank For International Settlements.
7.	Berger, A. N., and G. F. Udell, 1994,“Did Risk-Based Capital Allocate Bank Credit and Cause a ‘Credit Crunch’ in the United States?”Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 26, no. 3(August):585-628.
8.	Bernanke, B., and C. Lown, 1991, “The Credit Crunch.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 2: 205-47.
9.	Bernanke, B.S. & M. Gertler, 1995,“Inside the Black Box: the Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission”,Journal of Economic Perspectives,p:27-28  
10.	Bhattacharya, S., M. Plank, G. Strobl, and J. Zechner, 2002, “Bank Capital Regulation with Random Audits.”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26, no.7-8(July)-:1301-21.
11.	Black, F., and J. C. Cox, 1976,“Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions”Journal of Finance 31, no. 2(May):351-67.
12.	Bliss, R. R., 2001,“Market Discipline and Subordinated Debt: A Review of Some Salient Issues.”Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Economic Perspectives 25, no. 1(first quarter):24-45.
13.	Blum, J., 1999, “Do Capital Adequacy Requirements Reduce Risks in Banking?”Journal of Banking and Finance 23,no. 5(May):755-71.
14.	Buchinsky, M., and O. Yosha, 1997, “Endogenous Probability of Failure for a Financial Intermediary: A Dynamic Model.”Unpublished paper, Brown University.
15.	Calem, P. S., and R. Rob, 1996, “The Impact of Capital-Based Regulation on Bank Risk-Taking: A Dynamic Model.”Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finance and Economics Discussion Series, no. 96-12.
16.	Calomiris, C. W., 1998,“Blueprints for a New Global Financial Architecture.”U.S. House of Representatives, Joint Economic Committee. October 7. Available at 
< http://www.house.gov/jec/imf/blueprnt.htm >
17.	Calomiris, C. W., and C. Kahn, 1991, “The Role of Demandable Debt in Structuring Optimal Banking Arrangements.”American Economic Review 81, no. 3(June): 497-513.
18.	Carletti, E., 1999,“Bank Moral Hazard and Market Discipline.”Unpublished paper, London School of Economics.
19.	Chang, Chun, 1990,“The Dynamic Structure of Optimal Debt Contracts.” Journal of Economic Theory 52 (October):68-86.
20.	Chris Marrison, 2002, The Fundamentals of Risk Measurement, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
21.	Decamps, J. P., J. C. Rochet, and B. Roger, 2004, “The Three Pillars of Basel II: Optimizing the Mix.”Journal of Financial Intermediation 13, no. 2(April):132-55.
22.	Dewatripont, M., and J. Tirole, 1994, Prudential Regulation of Banks. Cambridge: MIT Press.
23.	Dixit, A. K., 1993, The Art of Smooth Pasting. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
24.	Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck, 1994, Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
25.	Ericsson, J., 2000, “Asset Substitution, Debt Pricing, Optimal Leverage and Maturity.”Finance 21, no. 2(December):39-70.
26.	Estrella, A., 1998, “Formulas or Supervision? Remarks on the Future of Regulatory Capital.”Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Economic Policy Review 4, no.3 (October): 191-200.
27.	—, 2000, “Costs and Benefits of Mandatory Subordinated Debt Regulation for Banks.”Unpublished paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
28.	Estrella, A., S. Park, and S. Peristiani, 2000, “Capital Rations as Predictors of Bank Failure.”Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Economic Policy Review 6, no. 2 (July):33-52.
29.	Evanoff, D., L. Wall, 2000, “Subordinated Debt and Bank Capital Reform.”Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper no.2000-07.
30.	—, 2001, “Sub-debt Yield Spreads as Bank Risk Measures.”Journal of Financial Services Research 20, no. 2-3 (October/December): 121-45.
31.	—, 2002,“Measures of the Riskiness of Banking Organizations: Subordinated Debt Yields, Risk-Based Capital, and Examination Ratings.”Journal of Banking and Finance 26, no. 5 (May):989-1009.
32.	Freixas, X. & J.C.Rochet, 1997, Microeconomics of Banking, MIT Press.
33.	Fries, S., P. Mella-Barral, and W. Perraudin, 1997,“Optimal Bank Reorganization and the Fair Pricing of Deposit Guarantees.”Journal of Banking and Finance 21, no. 4 (April): 441-68.
34.	Froot, K., and J. Stein, 1998, “Risk Management, Capital Budgeting, and Capital Structure Policy for Financial Institutions: An Integrated Approach.”Journal of Financial Economics 47, no. 1 (January); 55-82.
35.	Furfine, C., 2001,“Bank Portfolio Allocation: The Impact of Capital Requirements, Regulatory Monitoring, and Economic Conditions.”Journal of Financial Services Research 20, no. 1 (September): 33-56.
36.	Furlong, F., and N. Keeley, 1990,“A Reexamination of Mean-Variance Analysis of Bank Capital Regulation.”Journal of Banking and Finance 14, no. 1 (March): 69-84.
37.	Gennotte, G., and D. Pyle, 1991,“Capital Controls and Bank Risk.”Journal of Banking and Finance 15, no. 4-5 (September): 805-24.
38.	Gropp, R., J. Vesala, and G. Vulpes, 2002,“Equity and Bond Market Signals as Leading Indicators of Bank Fragility.”European Central Bank Working Paper no. 150, June.
39.	Hancock, D., and M. L. Kwast, 2001, “Using Subordinated Debt to Monitor Bank Holding Companies: Is It Feasible?”Journal of Financial Services Research 20, no. 2-3 (October/December): 147-87.
40.	Hancock, D., A. J. Laing, and J. A. Wilcox, 1995,“Bank Capital Shocks: Dynamic Effects on Securities, Loans, and Capital. ”Journal of Banking and Finance 19, no. 3-4 (June): 661-77.
41.	Hellwing, M., 1998,“Banks, Markets, and the Allocation of Risks in an Economy.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154, no. 1 (March): 328-45.
42.	Holmstrom, B., 1979, “Moral Hazard and Observability.”Bell Journal of Economics 10, no. 1 (spring): 74-91.
43.	Hubbard, R.G., 2000,“Capital-Market Imperfections, Investment, and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism”, Paper Prepared for Presentation at Bundesbank, Frankfurt, Germany.
44.	Jackson, P., C. Furfine, H. Groeneveld, D. Hancock, D. Jones, W. Perraudin, L. Radecki, and N. Yoneyama, 1999, “Capital Requirements and Bank Behaviour: The Impact of the Basel Accord.”Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Working Paper no. 1.
45.	Jaffee,D. & T.Russell, 1976,“Imperfect Information, Uncertainty and Credit Rationing.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90:651-66.
46.	Jan Frederik Slijkerman, David J.C. Smant and Casper G. de Vries, 2004, “Credit Rationing Effects of Credit VaR.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, Tinbergen.
47.	Jones, D., 2000, “Emerging Problems with the Basel Accord: Regulatory Capital Arbitrage and Related Issues.”Journal of Banking and Finance 24, no. 1-2 (January): 35-58.
48.	Jones, D. J., and K. King, 1995,“The Implementation of  Prompt Corrective Action: An Assessment.”Journal of Banking and Finance 19, no. 3-4 (June):491-510.
49.	Karlin, S., and H. Taylor, 1981,  A Second Course In Stochastic Processes. New York: Academic Press.
50.	Kim, D., and A. M. Santomero, 1988,“Risk in Banking and Capital Regulation.”Journal of Finance 43, no. 5 (December):1219-33.
51.	Koehn, M.., and A. Santomero, 1980,“Regulation of Bank Capital and Portfolio Risk.”Jou-
rnal of Finance 35, no. 5 (December): 1235-44.
52. Lacker, Jeffrey M., and John A. Weinberg, 1989,“Optimal Contracts Under Costly State Falsification.” Journal of Political Economy 97(December):1345-63.
53.	Leland, H., 1994, “Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital Structure.”Journal of Finance 49, no. 4 (September):1213-52.
54.	-, 1998, “Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure. ”Journal of Finance 53, no. 4 (August): 1213-43.
55.	Leland, H., and K. B. Toft, 1996, “Optimal Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads. ”Journal of Finance 51, no. 3 (July): 987-1019.
56.	Levonian, M., 2001, “Subordinated Debt and the Quality of Market Discipline in Banking.” Unpublished Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
57.	Mankiw, N.G., 1996, ”The Allocation of Credit and Financial Collapse”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103:101-130.
58.	Marshall, David A., and Edward Simpson Prescott, 2001, “Bank Capital Regulation with and without State-Contingent Penalties.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy 54(June):139-84.
59.	Merton, R., 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. ”Journal of Finance 29, no. 2 (May):449-69.
60.	—, 1977, “An Analytic Derivation of the Cost of Deposit Insurance and Loan Guarantees: An Application of Modern Option Pricing Theory. ”Journal of Banking and Finance 1: 3-11.
61.	-, 1978, “On the Cost of Deposit Insurance When There Are Surveillance Costs. ”Journal of Business 51, no. 3 (July): 439-52.
62.	Milne, A., and A. E. Whalley, 2001, “Bank Capital Regulation and Incentives for Risk-Taking.” City University Business School Discussion Paper. London.
63.	Mishkin, F. S., 1996, “Evaluating FDICIA.” Unpublished Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
64.	Monnet, Cyril, and Erwan Quintin, 2003, “Optimal Contracts in a Dynamic Costly State Verification Model.” Manuscript, July.
65.	Mookherjee, Dilip, and Ivan Png, 1989, “Optimal Auditing, Insurance, and Redistribution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104(May):399-415.
66.	Morgan, D., 2002, “Rating Banks: Risk and Uncertainty in an Opaque Industry. ”American Economic Review 92, no. 4 (September): 874-88.
67.	Mullins, H. M., and D. H. Pyle, 1994,“Liquidation Costs and Risk-Based Bank Capital.” Journal of Banking and Finance 18, no. 1 (January): 113-38.
68.	Pages, H., and J. Santos, 2001,“Optimal Supervisory Policies and Depositor-Preference Laws.”Bank for International Settlements Discussion Paper. Basel, Switzerland.
69.	Peek, J., and E. Rosengren, 1995, “Bank Regulation and the Credit Crunch.”Journal of Banking and Finance 19, no. 3-4 (June): 679-92.
70.	Philippe Jorion, 2005,Value at Risk:The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
71.	Prescott, E.S., 2004,“Auditing and Bank Capital Regulation.”Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,  Economic Quarterly 90/4(Fall):47-63.
72.	Rochet, J. C., 1992,“Capital Requirements and the Behaviour of Commercial Banks.”European Economic Review 36, no. 5 (June) : 1137-70.
73.	Rochet, Jean-Charles, 1999,“Solvency Regulations and the Management of Banking Risks.”European Economic Review 43(April):981-90.
74.	—, 2004, “Balancing the Three Pillars of Basel II.”FRB of  New York Review 10, no. 2 (Sept.): 7-21.
75.	Saidenberg, M., and T. Schuermann, 2003,“The New Basel Capital Accord and Questions for Research.”Unpublished Paper, University of  Pennsylvania Wharton School, Financial Institutions Center.
76.	Santos, J., 1996, “Glass-Steagall and the Regulatory Dialectic.”Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary, February.
77.	—, 2000, “Bank Capital Regulation in Contemporary Banking Theory: A Review of the Literature.”Bank for International Settlements Working Paper no. 90. Basel, Switzerland.
78.	Sironi, A., 2001, “An Analysis of European Banks’ SND Issues and Its Implications for the Design of a Mandatory Subordinated Debt Policy.” Journal of Financial Services Research 20, no. 2-3(October/December): 233-66.
79.	Smith, D., 2002,“Quarterly Macroeconomic Model of the UK and World Economics”, Working Draft,  edition, Willaims de Broe,Lodon:22-23.
80.	Smith, Bruce D., and Cheng Wang, 1998,“Repeated Insurance Relationships in a Costly State Verification Model: with an Application to Deposit Insurance.”Journal of Monetary Economics 42(July):207-40.
81.	Stein J.C., 1998,“An Adverse-Selection Model of Bank Asset and Liability Management with Implications for the Transmission of Monetary Policy”. RAND Journal of Economics, 29:466-486.
82.	Stiglitz, J. & A. Weiss, 1981,“Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect  Information”, American Economic Review,71:393-410.
83.	Thakor, A. V., 1996, “Capital Requirements, Monetary Policy, and Aggregate Bank Lending: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Finance 51,no. 1(March): 279-324.
84.	Townsend, Robert M., 1979,“Optimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification.”Journal of Economic Theory21(October):265-93.
85.	Williamson,S.D., 1996,“Costly Monitoring, Financial Intermediation, and Equilibrium Credit Rationing”, Journal of Monetary Economics,18:159-79.
86.	Wong, M., W. Y. Cheng and C. Y. P. Wong, 2003,“Market Risk Management of Banks: Implications from the Accuracy of Value-at-Risk Forecasts.” Manuscript.

中文文獻
1.行政院金管會銀行局與中華民國銀行公會-新巴塞爾資本協定共同研究小組,2005,銀行自有資本之計算與自有資本標準之國際通則:修正版架構,財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
2.沈中華,2003,「BaselⅡ的缺點及改進建議」,台灣金融財務季刊,第四輯第一期。
3.______,2004,「實施BaselⅡ可能會加重景氣循環與解決之道」,經濟日報。
4.______、謝孟芬,1999,「風險值的風險:考慮跳躍及漲跌幅的計算方式」,貨幣市場雙月刊,3:5,17-30。
5.______ ,2005,金融市場,新陸書局。
6. 李堯賢,莊洺炘,2005,「作業風險對銀行經營管理之分析」,研討會論文,華人經濟圈企業競爭力與經營管理學術研討會,中華大學經營管理研究所。
7. 徐如慧,2003,「現行信用風險模型之評估」,台灣證券交易所證交資料,第494期,頁32。 
8. 陳裘逸、張保華,2003,「資產證券化定義和模式的檢討—以真實出售為中心」,金融研究,第十期。
9. 曾令寧、黃仁德,2004,風險基準資本指南-新巴塞爾資本協定,台灣金融研訓院。
10.龐中懿,2003,「巴塞爾銀行監理委員會對銀行外部稽核規範之探討」,碩士論文,元智大學會計研究所。
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信