§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-0107201919084700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2019.00022
論文名稱(中文) 企業社會責任報告書、企業社會責任表現與財務績效之關聯性
論文名稱(英文) The Relation between Corporate Social Responsibility Report, Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Financial Performance
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 林妤庭
研究生(英文) Yu-Ting Lin
學號 607600094
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2019-06-13
論文頁數 81頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 謝宜樺
委員 - 吳幸蓁
委員 - 汪美伶
關鍵字(中) 企業社會責任報告書
企業社會責任表現
財務績效
關鍵字(英) Corporate Social Responsibility Report
Corporate Social Responsibility Performance
Financial Performance
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
企業社會責任(Corporate social responsibility, CSR)已漸漸融入公司的經營管理中,多數公司藉由企業社會責任報告書揭露公司的企業社會責任落實成果,以協助利害關係人衡量公司的企業社會責任落實程度。本研究期望了解公司的企業社會責任落實對財務績效產生的影響。本研究以2013年至2017年我國上市櫃公司的企業社會責任報告書為樣本,以報告書按GRI準則的揭露數量衡量企業社會責任的落實程度。此外,依據企業社會責任三重底線價值將公司的企業社會責任內涵拆解為經濟、環境、社會三面向,並探討三個面向的落實程度對財務績效的影響。亦探討公司企業社會表現受到評比機構的認可,是否會強化利害關係人對公司的信心,因而正向干擾企業社會責任落實與財務績效間之關係。實證結果顯示,公司企業社會責任的落實程度越高,公司財務績效越佳,且公司環境、社會揭露的落實程度對公司財務績效有正向影響,另外公司的企業社會責任表現能對企業社會責任落實與公司資產報酬率之間有正向干擾效果。
英文摘要
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gradually been integrated into the company's management. Companies use the CSR report to disclose CSR outcome, and assist stakeholders in measuring the company’s CSR implementation evaluation. The purpose of this research is to understand the effect of CSR implementation evaluation on financial performance. This study sampled from Taiwan Listed and OTC companies’ CSR reports which measure CSR implementation evaluation in accordance with the number of disclosures by GRI standard from 2013 to 2017. CSR has been valued and divided into Economic, Environmental, and Social dimensions based on triple bottom line valuation, meanwhile, relation between the implementation evaluation of above three dimensions with financial performance are studied respectively.  In addition, this study also survey whenever the companies’ CSR implementation evaluated by external organization, if it will strengthen the confidence of stakeholders and has positive effect on CSR implementation and financial performance. The empirical results indicate that the higher CSR implementation evaluation, the better the company's financial performance, and the implementation evaluation of the company's environment and social will have a positive influence on the company's financial performance. Furthermore, the company's CSR performance has a positive moderation effect between CSR implementation evaluation and the company's return on assets.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
中文摘要	I
英文摘要	II
第一章 緒論	1
第一節  研究背景、動機	1
第二節  研究目的	4
第三節  研究架構	5
第二章 文獻回顧	7
第一節  企業社會責任	7
第二節  財務績效	14
第三節  企業社會責任與財務績效	17
第四節  企業社會責任三重底線與財務績效	22
第五節  企業社會責任表現	28
第三章 研究方法	34
第一節  研究樣本、資料來源與研究期間	34
第二節  研究變數	36
第三節  實證模型	42
第四章 實證結果分析	44
第一節 敘述性統計	44
第二節 相關分析	49
第三節 回歸分析	55
第四節 增額測試	61
第五章 結論與建議	63
第一節 研究結論	63
第二節 研究貢獻	64
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議	65
參考文獻	67
中文文獻	67
英文文獻	69
附錄1	74

圖目錄
圖1- 1 研究流程圖	6
圖2- 1 研究架構	33

 
表目錄
表2- 1 評比機構比較表	31
表3- 1觀察值產業分布情形	35
表3- 2 觀察值年度分布情形	35
表3- 3 依GRI STANDARD衡量揭露程度之分數上限	38
表3- 4 本研究變數彙整	41
表4- 1 敘述性統計	46
表4- 2 自變數歷年敘述性統計	47
表4- 3 相關係數表_模型一與模型三	51
表4- 4 應變數與自變數間相關係數表_模型一與模型三	52
表4- 5 相關係數表_模型二	53
表4- 6 應變數與自變數間相關係數表_模型二	54
表4- 7 模型一_企業社會責任對財務績效之影響	56
表4- 8 模型二_企業社會責任三重底線與財務績效	59
表4- 9 模型三_企業社會責任獎項為干擾變數之實證結果	60
表4- 10 增額測試_T檢定	62
參考文獻
參考文獻
中文文獻
上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則,民105年07月28日。
上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法,中華民國108年01月04日。
上櫃公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法,中華民國108年01月11日。
上市上櫃公司誠信經營守則,中華民國108年05月23日。
勤業眾信,2018,2018台灣企業舞弊風險調查報告,取自https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tw/Documents/risk/tw-fraud-risk-report-2018.pdf 
池祥萱、繆文娟、莊瀅臻,2014,企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球500大公司的證據,管理學報,第31卷第1期:1-19。
沈中華、張元,2008,企業的社會責任為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例,經濟論文,第36卷第3期:339-385。
林春華、徐瑋、陳美華,2006,探討台灣企業社會責任表現與財務績效表現兩者的變動之關係,致遠管理學院學報,第1卷:295-310。
侯啟娉、蔡玉琴、倪伯煌、李子文,2017,財務績效、公司稅與企業社會責任揭露,商管科技季刊,第18卷第1期 :75-100。
祝道松、盧正宗、洪晨桓、楊秀萍,2008,環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影響,當代會計,第9卷第2期 :237-269。
吳文雅、莫冬立、張凱評、陳科里、巫宜株、陳譽文、翁儷嘉、宋彥霆,2017,GRI 準則(原著者:Global Sustainability Standards Board),社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會(原著出版年:2016),取自https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-translations/gri-standards-traditional-chinese-translations-download-center/?g=39c5dd71-59d7-4abf-831f-651aa8bc1a64。
張育琳,2016,碳排放量、綠化投資策略與公司績效,管理與系統,第23 卷第2 期,197-222。
陳春盛、呂學穎,2009,建構職業安全衛生管理指標並重績效管理之研究–以某手機廠為例,工業安全衛生,第237卷,41-59。
陳宣亦,2017,企業社會責任報告書對利害關係人行為之影響,淡江大學會計系碩士論文。
陳庭萱、何瑞鎮、林玉婷,2016,企業社會責任對長短期股價的影響—以台灣銀行業為例,Review of Securities and Futures Markets,第28卷第4期,129-170。
梁連文、李盈慧,2016,企業社會責任與銀行效率關聯性之探討-三階段資料包落分析法,會計與財金研究,第9卷第1期,11-30。
黃瓊瑤、王癸元、張鳳真,2013,企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究,當代會計,第14 卷第2 期,175-204。
楊長林、黃榮華、黃靜蓮、梁忠鋅,2016,企業落實企業社會責任所遭遇之阻礙分析與應變策略之研究,管理研究學報,第16卷第1期,1-31。
錢銘貴、施勵行,2007,綠色供應鏈管理實務採行之驅力壓力與組織績效關係之實證研究-以台灣電機電子產業爲例,人文社會科學研究,第1卷第1期,72-98。
 
英文文獻
Aiken, L. S. and S. G. West. 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
Albinger, H. S. and Freeman, S. J. 2000. Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28(3): 243–253.
Alexander, G. J., and Buchholz, R. A. 1978. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal 21(3): 479–486.
Aragon-Sanchez, A., I. Barba-Aragon, and R. Sanz-Valle. 2003. Effects of training on business results. International Journal of Human Resource Management 14 (6): 956-980.
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., and Hatfield, J. D. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28(2): 446–463
Badawi, A., and AlQudah, A. 2019. The impact of anti-corrpution policies on the profitability and growth of firms in the stock market: Application on Singapore with a panel data analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas 53(1): 179-204
Becchetti, L., Di Giacomo, S., and Pinnacchio, D. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from a panel of US listed companies. Applied Economics 40: 541–567.
Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper and Row.
Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 497-505.
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G., 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal 35(1), 1-23.
Chen, Yi C., Hung, M., and Wang, Y. 2018. The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 65: 169-190.
Consolandi, C., A. Jaiswal-Dale, E. Poggiani, and A. Vercelli. 2009. Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index. Journal of Business Ethics 87(1): 185-197.
Dahlsrud, A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15(1): 1-13.
Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Tsang, A., Yang, Y. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86(1): 59–100 .
Dhaliwal, D., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., Yang, Y. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: international evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87(3): 723–759.
Dowell, G., Hart, S., and Yeung, B. 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science 46(8): 1059-1074.
Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.
Flammer, C., 2015. Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization, Strategic Management Journal 36(10): 1469-1485.
Forbrun, C. and Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33(2): 233-258.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from
http://umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B. and Hansen, J. M., 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30(4): 425-445.
Griffin, J. J. and Mahon, J. F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business and Society 36(1): 5-31.
Guiso, L., Sapienza P., and Zingales, L. 2015. The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics 117 (1): 60-76.
Hair, J. T., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1995. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 4th Ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hillman, A. J., and G. D. Keim, 2001. Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2):125-139.
Jones, T. M., 1995. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review 20(2): 404–437.
Khan M., G. Serafeim and A. Yoon, 2016. Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. The Accounting Review 91(6): 1697-1724.
Kim, K. H., Kim, M., Qian, C. 2018. Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance: A Competitive-Action Perspective. Journal of Management 44(3): 1097–1118.
KPMG. 2017. KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. Amsterdam: KPMG International. Retrieved from
https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf.
Lanis, R., and G. Richardson. 2015. Is corporate social responsibility performance associated with tax avoidance? Journal of Business Ethics 127 (2): 439-457.
Lin, C. H., H. L. Yang, and D. Y. Liou. 2009. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: Evidence from Business in Taiwan. Technology in Society 31(1): 56-63.
Lourenço, I. C., Branco, M. C., Curto, J. D., and Eugénio, T. 2012. How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 108(4): 417-428.
Matsumura, E. M., R. Prakash, and S. C. Vera-Muñoz. 2014. Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review 89 (2): 695-724.
McGuire, J., Sundgren, A. and Schneeweis, T. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(4): 854-872.
McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21: 603–609.
McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1): 117-127.
Nelling, E., and E. Webb, 2009. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the virtuous circle revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 32(2): 197-209.
Nollet, J., Filis, G., and Mitrokostas, E. 2016. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling 52: 400-407.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., and Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3): 403–441.
Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84(12): 78-92.
Quéré B.P., Nouyrigat G., and Baker C.R. 2018. A Bi-Directional Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings and Company Financial Performance in the European Context. Journal of Business Ethics 148: 527-544.
Robinson, M., Kleffner, A., and Bertels, S. 2011. Signaling Sustainability Leadership: Empirical Evidence of the Value of DJSI Membership. Journal of Business Ethics 101(3): 493-505.
Ruf, B., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J. and Paul, K. 2001. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 32(2): 143-156.
Russo, M. V. and Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resouces-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 534-559.
Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A.B., and Buchholtz, A. K. 2003. Philanthropy as strategy when corporate charity “begins at home”. Business and Society 42: 169–201.
Schuler, D. A., and Cording, M. 2006. A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review 31(3): 540-558.
Sethi, S. P. 1975.  Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytical framework. California Management Review 17(3): 58-64.
Stanwick, P. A., and Stanwick, S. D. 1998. The Relation between CSP and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 195-204. 
Tsoulfas, G. T., and Pappis, C. P. 2006. Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation. Journal of Cleaner Production 14: 1593-1602.
Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18: 303-319.
Wang, Q., Dou, J., and Jia S. 2016. A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: The Moderating Effect of Contextual Factors. Business and Society 55(8): 1083-1121.
Vance, S. C. 1975. Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks? Academy of Management Review 64(8): 18-24.
Van Vu, H., Tran, T. Q., Van Nguyen, T., and Lim, S. 2018. Corruption, types of corruption and firm financial performance: New evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Business Ethics 148(4): 847-858.
Yusoff, H., Mohamad, S. S., and Darus, F. 2013. The Influence of CSR Disclosure Structure on CorporateFinancial Performance: Evidence from Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Procedia Economics and Finance 2013: 213-220.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信