§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-0107201913242900
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2019.00012
論文名稱(中文) 高階管理團隊多樣性對財務績效之關聯性研究:以中國上市公司為例
論文名稱(英文) The impact of top management team diversity on financial performance: The evidence of public firms in Chinese
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 林建宇
研究生(英文) Jian-Yu Lin
學號 606600392
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2019-06-18
論文頁數 50頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 徐志順(cshsu@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 徐志順(cshsu@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 張雅淇(140198@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 林芳綺(fclin@mail.nptu.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 高階管理團隊多樣性
財務績效
中國上市公司
關鍵字(英) Top management team diversity
Financial performance
Chinese company
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
高階管理團隊被視為改變公司績效的關鍵,近年來受到公司策略管理學界的矚目,因此,本研究欲探討高階管理團隊特性(教育程度、性別、任期、年齡)與綜合指標對於企業財務績效之影響。過去管理文獻在探討高階管理團隊之議題時,多以團隊成員單一特性是否影響財企業之財務績效為焦點,但是結果並不一致,因此本研究欲再一次探討高階管理團隊特性對於企業財務績效之關聯性。本研究樣本資料取自台灣經濟新報(Taiwan Economic Journal;TEJ)及國泰安資料庫(CSMAR),選取2012年至2016年之資料,以中國上市公司之高階管理團隊作為本研究資料分析資樣本。
實證結果發現,會計績效上,高階管理團隊多樣性對於公司會計績效上呈現負向不顯著,而在市場績效上,高階管理團隊多樣性對於公司財務績效有正向顯著影響。
英文摘要
The top management team is regarded as the key to change the company's performance, which has attracted the attention of the corporate strategy management circle in recent years. Therefore, this study is focusing on the impact of the top management team characteristics (education level, gender, tenure, and age) on the financial performance of enterprises. Even though there have been lots of management literature discussing the topics of the top management team, which usually concentrated on whether company financial performance affected by the characteristic of team members, but the conclusion was inconsistent. Hence, this study intended to examine the connections between the senior management team characteristics and financial performance of enterprises. The sample of this study is composed of the top management team in Chinese companies, collecting data from 2012 to 2016 on the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) and CSMAR.
According to the results, in accounting performance, the diversity of the top management team has a negative and non-significant impact on Accounting financial performance. However, in market performance, diversity has a positive significant impact on corporate financial performance.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
第壹章、緒論......................................1
第一節、研究背景與動機.............................1
第二節、研究目的..................................4
第三節、研究流程..................................4
第貳章、文獻探討..................................6
第一節、高階管理團隊(TMT)功能......................6
第二節、高階管理團隊之特徵.........................9
第三節、高階管理團隊多樣性與財務績效...............13
第参章、假說與實證模型............................17
第一節、研究架構.................................17
第二節、研究假說.................................18
第三節、變數定義與衡量............................22
第四節、實證模型.................................25
第五節、統計方法.................................26
第六節、樣本選取.................................26
第肆章、實證結果與分析............................27
第一節、敘述性統計...............................27
第二節、相關性分析...............................30
第三節、迴歸分析.................................31
第伍章、結論與建議...............................37
第一節、研究結論.................................37
第二節、研究意涵.................................39
第三節、管理意涵.................................40
第四節、研究限制與未來研究之建議...................41
參考文獻.........................................42
圖目錄
圖1 研究流程圖....................................5
圖3-1-1研究架構圖................................17
表目錄
表4.1敘述性統計..................................27
表4.2相關係數....................................30
表4.3高階管理團隊特性與ROA之迴歸結果...............31
表4.4高階管理團隊特性與Tobin’s Q之迴歸結果.........32
表4.5高階管理團隊多樣性與ROA之迴歸結果.............35
表4.6高階管理團隊多樣性與Tobin’s Q之迴歸結果.......36
表5-1研究假說與實證結果...........................37
參考文獻
參考文獻
中文文獻
1.王雪莉、馬琳與王艷麗,2013,高階團隊職能背景對企業績效的影響:以中國信息技術行業上市公司為例,南開管理評論,第16卷第4期:80-93。
2.任頲與王崢,2010,女性參與高管團隊對企業績效的影響:基於中國民營企業的實證研究,南開管理評論,第13卷第5期:81-91。
3.李善民與朱滔,2005,中國上市公司併購的長期績效-基於證券市場的研究,第5期。
4.李馨蘋與劉清明,2007,從公司治理與企業績效之觀點看高階主管異動之因素,真理財金學報:1-22。
5.余惠芳與王永昌,2011,財務預警與公司治理-台灣傳統產業之實證研究,應用經濟論叢,第90期(12月):209-241。
6.吳孟紋與孫鈴雅,2014,中國銀行業女性董事與銀行財務績效之關係,兩岸金融季刊,第2卷第2期(6月):1-27。
7.吳成頌、黃送欽、唐偉正,2014,高管團隊背景特徵與銀行創新能力相關研究,金融評論,第4期第19卷:43-51。
7.杜書伍,2016,打造將才的基因,台北:天下雜誌。
8.林秀鳳與李建然,2008,管理特質對企業績效之影響,中山管理評論,第16卷第4期(12月):703-742。
9.林鳳麗與廖育旻,2010,台灣上市公司自由現金流量與營收成長是否影響公司績效?縱橫門檻迴歸模型之運用,會計與公司治理,第7卷第1期(6月):1-30。
10.洪儒瑤與洪裕琨,2007,Tobin’s Q與內部人持股關係符合展望理論嗎?-行為財務觀點,中華技術學院學報,第36期(6月):213-228。
11.祝愛民、徐曉惠與于麗娟,2016,高管團隊異質性對企業績效的影響-基於不同生命週期階段企業的研究,沈陽工業大學學報(社會科學版),第1期(1月):78-84。
12.曹壽民、陳光政、紀信義與羅秀玲,2009,股權結構、盈餘管理與公司價值:衍生性金融商品與異常應計項目的角色,會計學報,第1卷第2期(5月):63-91。
13.粘季為、張元與許敏政,2017,公司董事會多樣性是否有助於降低公司風險?,兩岸金融季刊,第5卷第3期(9月):1-44。
14.黃家齊與蔡達人,2003,團隊多元化與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效,臺大管理論叢,第13卷第2期:233-280。
15.劉韻僖,2006,台灣高科技產業高階經營團隊及董事會權力與組織績效關係之研究,交大管理學報,第26卷第1期(6月):173-200。
16.潘淑琦、黃秀霜(2012),非營利組織女性領導者特質與領導行為之研究,非.營利組織管理學刊,第12期,頁80-105
17.鍾憲瑞、劉韻僖與方至民,1998,管理學術界在做什麼?-以學術期刊為分析對象,中山管理評論,管理教育特刊: 49-74。
英文文獻
1. Adams, R.B. and Ferreira, D. (2009). Woman in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 94, Issue 2, pp. 291-309. 
2. Bantal, K. A. and Jackson, S. E., (1989), Top Management and Innovations in Banking:Does the Composition of the Team Make a Difference?, Strategic Management Journal,Vol.10, No.1,pp. 802-836.
3. Carpenter, M.A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 275-284. 
4. Cambrea, D. R. , Lussana, G. , Quarato, F. and Capello, P. A. (2017), Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Fashion and Luxury industry, Corporate Ownership, Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 325-340.
5. Chemmanur, T. J. and I., Paeglis, (2005). Management Quality, Certification, and Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 76, Issue 2, pp. 331-368.
6. Chen, H. L.,Hsu, W. T. ,Huang ,Y. S.(2010).Top management team characteristics, R&D investment and capital structure in the IT industry. Small Business Economic, Vol. 35, Issue: 3, pp. 319-333.
7. Chen, H. L. (2011). Does board independence influence the top management team? Evidence from strategic decisions toward internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 334-350.
8. Child, J. 1972.Organizational Structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. London Graduate School of Business Studies 6: 1-22.
9. Chaganti, R. and Sambharya, R. (1987), Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 393-401.
10. Dollinger, M. J. (1984). Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), pp. 351-368.
11. Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D.C. (1990). Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:3, pp. 484-503. 
12. Forbes, D. P and Milliken, F. J. (1999). Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.  489-505
13. Goll, I., R. B., Sambharya, and L. A., Tucci, (2001). Top Management Team Composition, Corporate Ideology, and Firm Performance. Management International Review, Vol.41, No. 2, pp. 109-129.
14. Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P. and Thomas, H. (1988) , Diversity, Diversification, and Profitability Among British Manufacturing Companies, 1972-1984, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 771-801.
15. Groysberg, B. 2014. The seven skills you need to thrive in the C-Suite. Harvard Business Review 92(March): 58-66.
16. Habib, M. M. and Victor, B. (1991), Strategy, Structure, and Performance of U.S. Manufacturing and Service MNCs: A Comparative Analysis, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 589-606.
17. Hoffman, L.R., & Maier, N.R.F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol.62, Issue 2, pp. 401-407.
18. Hambrick, D. C. and P. A., Mason, (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9(2): pp. 193-206.
19. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S . and Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, No.4, pp. 659-684.
20. Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, Issue 2, pp. 334-343. 
21. Hart, P., and Mellons, J. Management youth and company growth: A correlation? Management Decision, 1970, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 50-53.
22. Harrison, D.A.and Klein, K.J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety or disparity in organizations, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, Issue 4, pp. 1199-1228.
23. Herrmann, P. and D. K., Datta, 2005. Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, Vol.16, Issue 1, pp. 69-78.
24. Hitt, M. A. and Barr, S. H. (1989). Managerial Selection Decision Modles: Examination of Configural Cue Processing, Vol. 74, No.1, pp. 53-61.
25. Hillman, A. J. and Dalziel, T. (2003), Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 383-396.
26. Hollingshead, A. B., (1996), The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 68, Issue 3, pp. 181-193. 
27. T. Hafsi, G. Turgut, (2012), Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance:Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 112, Issue 3, pp. 463-479.
28. Jaw,Y.L and Lin, W.T. (2009). Corporate elite characteristics and firm’s internationalization: CEO-level and TMT-level roles. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 20 Issue: 1, pp. 220-233.
29. Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 305-360.
30. Haleblian, J. and Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion.Academy of Management, pp. 844-863.
31. Kimberly, J. R. and Evanisko, M. J.(1981), Organizational Innovation:The influence of Individual, Organization, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 689-713.
32. Lindenberg, E. B. and Ross, S. A. 1981. Tobin's Q ratio and industrial Organization. The Journal of Business 54: 1-32.
33. Lam, Kevin C. K., McGuinness, Paul B. and Vieito, Joao P. (2013), CEO gender, executive compensation and firm performance in Chinese-listed enterprises, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp. 1136-1159.
34. Lindenberg, E. B. and Ross, S. A. (1981), Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization, The Journal of Business, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 1-32.
35. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Meyer, A. D. and Coleman, H. J. (1978), Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.546-562.
36. Miller. D. 1991.CEO Tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science 37: 34-52.
37. Michel, J.G. and Hambrick, D.C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, No. 1, pp.9-37. 
38. Miller. D. (1991) .CEO Tenure and the Match between Organization and Environment, Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp.34-52.
39. Miller, T.and Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, Issue 5, pp.755-786.
40. Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team internationalization and firm performance: the mediating role of foreign market entry, Management International Reviews, Vol. 50, Issue 2, pp. 185-206.
41. Papadakis, V. M.and Barwise, P.(2002), How Much do CEOs and Top Managers Matter in Strategic Decision-Making British,  Journal of Management, Vol.13, No.1, pp.83-95.
42. Pfeffer, J. (1983), Organizational demography, Research in Organizational Behavior, No. 5, pp.299-357.
43. Richard, O. C., (2000), Racial Diversity, Business Strategy, and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based View, Academy of Management, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp.164-177.
44. Rhodes, S. R. (1983), Age-Related Differences in Work Attitudes and Behavior: A Review and Conceptual Analysis, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.93, No.2, pp.328-367.
45. Sambharya, R. B. (1996), Foreign experience of Top Management Team and International Diversification Strategies of U.S. Multinational Corporations, Strategic Management, Vol. 17, Issue 9, pp. 739-746.
46. Salancik, G. R. and Pfeffer, J. (1978), A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, PP.224-253.
47. Schroder, H. M., Driver, M., and Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
48. Shrader, C. B., V. L. Blackburn,and P. Iles (1997), Women in Management and Firm Financial Value: An Exploratory Study, Journal of Management, Vol. 9, No.3 , pp. 355-372.
49. Shuying, W. , Shuijuan, Z. , Bobo, L. (2017), Effect of Diversity on Top Management Team to the bank’s innovation ability-based on the nature of ownership perspective, Science Direct, Vol. 174, pp.240-245.
50. Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims Jr, H. P., O'Bannon, D. P., and Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, No.3, pp. 412-438.
51. Smith, N., Smith, V., and Verner, M. (2005). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 55 Issue: 7, pp.569-593 
52. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior, Social Science Information, Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 65-93.
53. Tihanyi, J., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C.M., and Dalton, D. R., (2000), Composition of the Top Management Team and Firm International Diversification, Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 1157-1177.
54. Wagner, W.G., Pfeffer, J., and O’Reilly, C.A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29:1, pp.74-93. 
55. Wood, W. 1987. Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. Psychological Bulletin 102: 53-71.
56. Westhead,P., Wright.M., and Ucbasaran.D. (2001). The Internationalization of New and small firms:A resource based view. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.16 Issue:4, pp.333-358.
57. Welbourne, T.M., Cycyota, C.S., and Ferrante, C.J. (2007). Wall Street reaction to woman in IPOs: an examination of gender diversity in top management teams, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 32, Issue 5, 524-547. 
58. Wiersema, M. F. and K. A., Bantel, (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, No.1, pp.91-121.
59. Yamagata, H., Yeh, K. S., Stewman, S. and Dodge, H. (1997), Sex Segregation and Glass Ceilings: A Comparative Statics Model of Woman’s Career Opportunities in the Federal Government over a Quarter Century, American Journal of Sociology, Vol 103, No. 3, pp.566-632.
60. Zenger, T. R. and Lawrence, B. S. The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, (1989), pp.353-376
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信