§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-0107201821512500
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00018
論文名稱(中文) 新式查核報告關鍵查核事項之市場反應研究
論文名稱(英文) The market reaction to key audit matters in extended audit report
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 呂琍盈
研究生(英文) Li-Ying Lu
學號 605600237
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-06-15
論文頁數 63頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張謙恆
指導教授 - 張瑀珊
委員 - 薛敏正
委員 - 江家瑜
關鍵字(中) 新式查核報告
關鍵查核事項
市場反應
關鍵字(英) Extended audit report
Key audit matters
Market reaction
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
從美國安隆、世界通訊、雷曼兄弟等知名企業發生財務危機或舞弊事件,對全球經濟產生重大影響,各國監理機關紛紛提出因應對策,目的即改善查核報告資訊透明度。我國為了與國際審計準則接軌,於2016年正式實施新式查核報告,期望藉由實施新式查核報告提供更多攸關、個別化資訊予投資者。
本研究以2016年各間上市、上櫃公司的盈餘公告日作為事件日,並採用市場研究法中的市場模式,檢驗事件日前後是否存在顯著平均異常報酬、累積平均異常報酬,並以關鍵查核事項項目種類、產業關鍵查核事項報導、個數多寡、字數、可讀性等五種因素,探討新式查核報告中揭露關鍵查核事項對市場之影響。實證結果發現關鍵查核事項的不同項目種類會使累積平均異常報酬呈現顯著現象,有列出產業關鍵查核事項報導的公司及可讀性較高的公司,市場給予正向反應,最後關鍵查核事項個數及字數愈多的公司,其市場給予的累積平均異常報酬愈低。
英文摘要
Financial frauds usually had impacts on global economy, such as Enron, Worldcom, Lehman Brothers, etc. Supervision agencies in various countries attempt to improve the information transparency of audit report. In Taiwan, Financial Supervisory Commission formally implemented extended audit report in 2016. This study investigates the market reaction to key audit matters in extended audit report.
More specifically, this paper utilizes five characteristics as proxies for key audit matters, including the types of key audit matter items, critical key audit matter in specific industry, the quantities of key audit matters, the number of words for key audit matters, and the readability of key audit matters. The empirical result indicates that most of key audit matter items will cause significant cumulative average abnormal returns; the companies had reported the critical key audit matter in the industry and the companies had reported readable key audit matter they belongs to will have higher cumulative average abnormal returns; the more the quantities of key audit matters and the number of words for key audit matters reported, the lower the cumulative average abnormal returns.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
第壹章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的2
第三節 研究架構與流程3
第貳章 文獻探討5
第一節 新式查核報告與舊式查核報告之差異5
第二節 查核報告市場相關研究6
第三節 假說發展10
第參章 研究方法14
第一節 變數定義14
第二節 檢定方法15
第三節 各研究假說之檢定17
第肆章 實證結果21
第一節 研究期間及樣本選取21
第二節 單變量檢定22
第三節 敘述性統計分析40
第四節 相關係數分析41
第伍章 結論與建議45
第一節 研究結論45
第二節 研究限制46
第三節 未來研究建議46
第四節 研究貢獻47
參考文獻48
附錄54

表目錄
表2-1我國新舊查核報告格式之差異5
表2-3-1英國新式查核報告重大不實表達風險平均個數12
表2-3-2英國新式查核報告風險部分的平均字數12
表4-1全體樣本公司民國105年度產業分布21
表4-2-1收入相關與非收入相關CAR之比較22
表4-2-2收入舞弊與非收入舞弊CAR之比較23
表4-2-3應收帳款評價與減損與非應收帳款評價與減損CAR之比較23	
表4-2-4營運相關與非營運相關CAR之比較24
表4-2-5或有、負債、訴訟準備相關與非或有、負債、訴訟準備相關CAR之比較24
表4-2-6退休金與非退休金CAR之比較25
表4-2-7資產相關與非資產相關CAR之比較25
表4-2-8現金及約當現金與非現金及約當現金CAR之比較26
表4-2-9投資及金融工具相關與非投資及金融工具相關CAR之比較26	
表4-2-10股份基礎給付與非股份基礎給付CAR之比較27
表4-2-11內部控制相關與非內部控制相關CAR之比較27
表4-2-12商譽與非商譽CAR之比較28
表4-2-13存貨評價與減損及非存貨評價與減損CAR之比較28
表4-2-14其他資產評價與減損及其他資產評價與減損CAR之比較29
表4-2-15礦產、油產、瓦斯會計處理與非礦產、油產、瓦斯會計處理CAR之比較29
表4-2-16營建相關與非營建相關CAR之比較30
表4-2-17保險會計與非保險會計CAR之比較30
表4-2-18企業併購與非企業併購CAR之比較31
表4-2-19稅務相關與非稅務相關CAR之比較31
表4-2-20繼續經營假設與非繼續經營假設CAR之比較32
表4-2-21關係人交易與非關係人交易CAR之比較32
表4-2-22其他與非其他CAR之比較33
表4-2-23有列出產業關鍵查核事項報導的公司與無列出產業關鍵查核事項報導的公司AR之比較34
表4-2-24有列出產業關鍵查核事項報導的公司與無列出產業關鍵查核事項報導的公司CAR之比較35
表4-2-25個數多的公司與個數少的公司AR之比較	36
表4-2-26個數多的公司與個數少的公司CAR之比較36
表4-2-27字數多的公司與字數少的公司AR之比較37
表4-2-28字數多的公司與字數少的公司CAR之比較38
表4-2-29可讀性高的公司與可讀性低的公司AR之比較39
表4-2-30可讀性高的公司與可讀性低的公司CAR之比較40
表4-3敘述性統計分析(N=1,472)40
表4-4-1 CAR(-1,0)相關係數分析42
表4-4-2 CAR(0,1)相關係數分析42
表4-4-3 CAR(-1,1)相關係數分析43
表4-4-4 CAR(-2,2)相關係數分析43
表4-4-5 CAR(-5,5)相關係數分析44
表4-4-6 CAR(-10,-10)相關係數分析44
表5-1單變量檢定-呈現顯著累積平均異常報酬的關鍵查核事項項目種類	45

圖目錄
圖1-1論文流程圖4
參考文獻
王怡心,2016,善用「內控評估」強化專業判斷,會計研究月刊,第373期,頁56-60。
台灣經濟新報TEJ,2017,事件研究操作指南,引用自http://www.tej.com.tw/webtej/doc/EventStudy-usersManual.pdf。
巫鑫,2016,因應新式會計師查核報告-上市櫃公司辦理105年度決算最新實務,會計研究月刊,第373期,頁76-81。
李建然,2016,財務報表使用者如何解讀上市(櫃)公司-新式無保留意見查核報告,證券暨期貨月刊,第34卷,第9期(9月),頁16-29。
李建然,2017,新式會計師查核報告實施後會計師應注意事項及其可能之衝擊,會計師季刊,第270期,頁8-13。
沈中華與李建然,2000,事件研究法:財務與會計實證研究必備,初版,台北:華泰文化。
周志龍,2003,會計師查核報告影響股價之研究。未出版碩士論文。
林靜婷,1998,會計原則變動查核報告意見之市場反應研究。未出版碩士論文。
邱茗囷,2015,國際審計監理議題重要趨勢,證券暨期貨月刊,第33卷,第7期(7月) ,頁15-27。
金融監督管理委員會,2017,上市(櫃)公司105年財務報告採用新式查核報告情形,引用自http://www.fsc.gov.tw/fckdowndoc?file=/%E4%B8%8A%E5%B8%82(%E6%AB%83)%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8105%E5%B9%B4%E8%B2%A1%E5%8B%99%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E6%8E%A1%E7%94%A8%E6%96%B0%E5%BC%8F%E6%9F%A5%E6%A0%B8%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E6%83%85%E5%BD%A220170512.pdf&flag=doc
徐永堅,2016,審計準則公報第五十八號「查核報告中關鍵查核事項之溝通」之內容、影響與建議,第34卷,第9期(9月) ,頁30-41。
馬秀如,2017,關鍵查核事項!?以T公司員工收賄為例,會計研究月刊,第375期(2月),頁94-100。
區耀軍與林陣蒼,2016,專家傳真-新世代審計發展的機會與挑戰,引用自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160426000078-260202。
莊蕎安,2016,新式查核報告上路!主管機關談監理方向-專訪金融監督管理委員會證券期貨副局長 張振山,會計研究月刊,第373期,頁68-69。
陳玫慧,2000,會計師簽發保留意見與股價報酬--台灣市場的實證。未出版碩士論文。
陳政芳與李啟華,2006,國內會計師產業知識之衡量基礎,中山管理評論,第十四卷第3期,頁685-711。
項政,1999,會計師查核意見、財務危機與股價反應之研究。未出版碩士論文。
黃仲豪,2016,推動我國採用新式會計師查核報告-由英國實施經驗論起,證券暨期貨月刊,第34卷,第9期(9月),頁5-14。
黃劭彥、李宗霖與林思綺,2015,IAASB發布新會計師查核報告-提高資訊價值及透明度,會計研究月刊,第352期(3月),頁16-21。
黃劭彥、李宗霖與林陣蒼,2016,淺析新式會計師查核報告之「關鍵查核事項」,會計師季刊,第268期,頁18-28。
黃劭彥、李宗霖與賴怡君,2015,會計師查核報告新時代-提升資訊價值及透明度,會計師季刊,第262期,頁11-16。
賴永發,1996,由盈餘反應係數探討保留意見之資訊內涵。未出版碩士論文。
藍茵,2016,英國長式查核報告採用情況摘要,會計研究月刊,第373期,頁70-71。
Ameen, E. C., K. Chan, and D. M. Guffey. 1994. Information content of qualifed audit opinion for over-the-counter firms, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 21: 997–1011.
Asare, S. K., and A. M. Wright. 2012. Investors’, auditors’, and lenders’ understanding of the message conveyed by the standard audit report on the financial statements. Accounting Horizons 26 (2): 193–217.
Backof, A. G., K. Bowlin, and B. M. Goodson. 2017. The impact of proposed changes to the content of the audit report on jurors’ assessments of auditor negligence. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2446057.
Ball, R., R. G. Walker, and G. P. Whittred. 1979. Audit qualifications and share prices. Abacus 15:23–24.
Barnett, A., and K. Leoffler. 1979. Readability of accounting and auditing messages. Journal of Business Communication 16:49–59.
BDO. 2013a. Comment letter on FRC revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700: Requiring the auditor's report to address risks of material misstatement, materiality and a summary of audit scope.
BDO. 2013b. Comment letter on PCAOB rule making Docket Matter No. 34: Proposed auditing Standards on the Auditor's Report and the Auditor's Responsibilities Regarding Other Information and Related Amendments.
Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and T. L. Neal. 2009. The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (1):65–122.
Blake, K., J. V. Carcello, N. J. Harrison, M. J. Head, B. E. Roper, A. Simpson, T. Sondhi, R. M. Tarola, L. E. Turner, M. Williams, and A. Yerger. 2011. Response of a subgroup of the PCAOB's investor advisory group to the PCAOB's concept release concerning reports on audited financial statements and related amendments to PCAOB standards. Current Issues in Auditing 5(2):C21–C50.
Bolkestein, F. 2003.Auditor liability: An EU perspective, address at conference by Beachcroft Wansbroughs at the London Underwriting Centre, available at: http://goo.gl/fap3pR.
Brasel, K., M. M. Doxey, J. H. Grenier, and A. Reffett. 2016. Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91(5): 1345–1362.
Brown, T., T.M. Majors, and M. Peecher. 2015. The influence of evaluator expertise, a judgment rule, and critical audit matters on assessments of auditor legal liability. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Cardiff, M. 2013. Grant Thornton UK comment letter on FRC revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700: Requiring the auditor's report to address risks of material misstatement, materiality and a summary of audit scope.
Cates, T. 2013. KPMG UK comment letter on FRC revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700: Requiring the auditor's report to address risks of material misstatement, materiality and a summary of audit scope.
Choi, S. K., and D. C. Jeter. 1992. The effects of qualified audit opinions on earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15:229–241.
Chow, C.W., and S.J. Rice .1982. Qualified audit opinions and share prices -An investigation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 1 : 35–53.
Christensen, B. E., S. M. Glover, and C. J. Wolfe. 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors' decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (4):71–93. 
Church, B. K., S. M. Davis, and S. A. McCracken. 2008. The auditor's reporting model: a literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 22 (1):69–90.
Cooley LLP. 2016. Comments on PCAOB reproposal of expanded audit report reflect predictable split. Available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=213644d8-427e-4fb4-9a40-d47f4c1f862b
Deloitte. 2013. Comment Letter: PCAOB Rulemaking Docket No. 034. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket034/132b_Deloitte.pdf.
Dobija, D., I. Cieślak, and K. Iwuć. 2013. Extended audit reporting. An insight from the auditing profession in Poland. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2215605. 
Dopuch, N., R.W. Holthausen, and R.W. Leftwich .1986. Abnormal stock returns associated with media disclosures of‘subject to’qualified audit opinions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 8: 93–117. 
Fakhfakh, M. 2013. The readability of standardised reports by the International Federation of Accountants. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research 2(1):10–28.
Fields, L.P., and M.S. Wilkins.1991. The infoimation content of withdrawn audit qualifications: new evidence on the value of “subject-to” opinions’. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10(2) : 62–69.
Firth, M. 1978. Qualified audit reports: their impact on investment decisions. Accounting Review 53(3) :642–650.
FRC. 2013. Consultation paper: Revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700 – Requiring the auditor’s report to address risks of material misstatement, materiality, and a summary of the audit scope. London, England, Financial Reporting Council.
FRC. 2013d. Note of a public meeting: improving the auditor’s report. London, England: the Financial Reporting Council limited.
FRC. 2016. Extended auditor’s reports: A further review of experience.
Gaetano, C. 2014. PCAOB’s expanded audit report proposal raises litigation concerns. The Trusted Professional: Newspaper of the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants 17(5). Available at: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/97459056/pcaobs-expanded-audit-report-proposal-raises-litigation-concerns.
Gimbar, C., B. Hansen, and M. E. Ozlanski. 2016. The effects of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91 (6): 1629–1646.
Goff, P. G. 2013. TIAA-CREF comment letter on PCAOB rule making docket matter No. 34: proposed auditing standards on the auditor's report and the auditor's responsibilities regarding other information and related amendments.
Gold, A., U. Gronewold, and C. Pott. 2012. The ISA 700 auditor's report and the audit expectation gap - Do explanations matter? International Journal of Auditing 16 (3):286–307.
Gray, G. L., J. L. Turner, P. J. Coram, and T. J. Mock. 2011. Perceptions and misperceptions regarding the unqualified auditor’s report by financial statement preparers, users, and auditors. Accounting Horizons 25 (4): 659–684.
Gutierrez, E. F., M. Minutti-Meza, K.W. Tatum ,and M. Vulcheva. 2017. Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor's report in the United Kingdom. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741174.
Hay, D. 1998. Communication in auditors’ reports: variations in readability and the effect of audit firm structure. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting 5:179–197.
IAASB. 2013. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/Proposed%20ISA%20701%20(Revised)-final.pdf.
IAASB. 2013b. Reporting on audited financial statements: proposed new and revised International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). 
IOSCO. 2009. Auditor communications consultation report. Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. 
Kachelmeier, S. J., J. J. Schmidt , and K. Valentine. 2017. The disclaimer effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2481284.
Katz, D.M., 2014. Revamped audit report seen launching ‘wave of litigation’. Available at: http://ww2.cfo.com/auditing/2014/04/revamped-audit-report-seen-launching-wave-litigation/.
Lennox, C. S., J. J. Schmidt, and A. Thompson. 2017. Is the expanded model of audit reporting informative to investors? Evidence from the UK. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2619785.
Loughran, T., and B. Mcdonald. 2014. Measuring readability in financial disclosures. Journal of Finance 69(4): 1643–1671.
Maijoor, S., and A. Vanstraelen. 2012. Research opportunities in auditing in the EU, revisited. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31(1): 115–126.
Menon, K., and D. D. Williams. 2010. Investor reaction to going concern audit reports. The Accounting Review 85(6): 2075–2105.
Miller, B. P. 2010. The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review 85 (6):2107–2143.
PCAOB. 2013. Proposed Auditing Standards : The auditor’s report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion; the auditor’s responsibilities regarding other information in certain documents containing audited financial statements and the related auditor’s report; and related amendments to PCAOB standards. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket034/Release_2013-005_ARM.pdf.
PCAOB. 2014. Transcript of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s, 2014 Public Meeting on the Auditor's Reporting Model [unofficial]. Washington, D.C.: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 381.
Peecher, M. E., I. Solomon, and K. T. Trotman. 2013. An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38 (8):596-620.
Reffett, A. B. 2010. Can identifying and investigating fraud risks increase auditors' liability? The Accounting Review 85 (6):2145-2167.
Reid, L.C. 2015. Are auditor and audit committee report changes useful to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Available at: http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4697&context=utk_graddiss.
SEC. 2000. Final rule: audit committee disclosure. Available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-22266.htm.
Sirois, L. P., J. Bédard, and P. Bera. 2017. The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor's report: evidence from an eye-tracking study. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2469905.
Smith, K.W. 2017. Tell me more: a content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom. Available at SSRN:  https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821399.
Touche, W. 2014. PCAOB public meeting on the auditor's reporting model. Available at http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket034/04032014_Transcript.pdf.
Turner, J. L., T. J. Mock, P. J. Coram, and G. L. Gray. 2010. Improving transparency and relevance of auditor communications with financial statement users. Current Issues in Auditing 4 (1):A1-A8.
White, M. J. 2013. The path forward on disclosure. Available at http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539878806.
You, H., and X.j. Zhang. 2009. Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information. Review of Accounting Studies 14 (4):559-586.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信