創業者在創業的過程中，需要合適的創業輔導機制給予適時的協助，而創業輔導平台則是運作創業輔導機制的環境，如育成中心、加速器…等。從文獻回顧與時事觀察裡發掘創業輔導平台協助創業與促進經濟發展的價值。本研究將以創業者的角度，研究創業輔導平台的服務項目與創業者參與行為之關聯性。本研究採用質量並用法，透過創業輔導平台資料的調查研究，並與蒐集創業者訪談的資料進行彙總分析研究，從分析結果進一步瞭解創業者參與創業輔導平台的互動行為與關聯，從中整理得出創業輔導平台對創業者在創業過程中的輔助與各階段的助益。
研究結果整理發掘出，參與創業輔導平台會帶給創業者公司發展與獲利，且創業者選擇參與創業輔導平台時會考慮所處事業階段、對平台的服務需求與創業相關知識經驗等因素的命題。本研究亦整理出創業者公司各個事業階段適合參與哪種類型創業輔導平台的對應關係，如：建議處於種子期的創業者參與育成中心或創業社群類型平台…等，以及創業者選擇參與創業輔導平台建議評估事項，如：風險管理與投資報酬評估…等。期望藉本研究成果，提供創業者在公司發展策略上的媒合選擇，與創業輔導平台在經營戰略上營運規劃的參考。

Entrepreneurship needs the right and timely assistance counseling, and the platforms of entrepreneurial guidance is operating environment of entrepreneurial guidance and counselling (e.g., Incubator, Seed accelerator). Through the relevant literature search and current observation show economic value from the platforms of entrepreneurial guidance assist entrepreneurship. Therefore, the aim of this article attempts to explore how the platforms of entrepreneurial guidance’s services and behaviors of entrepreneurs participated in platform are related, from the point of view of entrepreneurs. This research involved a mixed approach using both quantitative data regarding the platforms’ and qualitative data regarding entrepreneurs’. Analysis results facilitate further to understand behaviors of entrepreneurs participated in platform and correlation among behaviors, and summarize the platform might assist each entrepreneurship stage of the build.
Results of this study showed propositions from behaviors of entrepreneurs participated in platform influence by entrepreneurship stage, platforms of service, knowledge, and experience. In addition, participate platforms achieve profitability and growth at the same time. It also attempts to sort out corresponding relationship between entrepreneurs’ corporate stage and participated in what kind of platform (e.g., corporation in seed stage recommend participated in incubator or entrepreneurial network), and assess matters for entrepreneurs participated in platform (e.g., risk assessment, evaluate investments). Results assist entrepreneurs’ corporate development strategy to do services matching and selection, and reference for platform strategy and operations to make a business plan.

主目錄	X
表目錄	XII
圖目錄	XIV
第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究背景	1
第二節	研究動機	3
第三節	研究目的	4
第四節	研究流程	5
第二章	文獻探討	7
第一節	創造性破壞理論	7
第二節	產業區理論	9
第三節	創新系統	10
第四節	開放式創新	12
第五節	創業輔導平台	13
第六節	文獻小結	23
第三章	研究方法	24
第一節	研究設計	24
第二節	資料分析方法	30
第四章	研究結果與分析	31
第一節	量化調查結果	31
第二節	質性研究結果	34
第五章	研究討論	53
第六章	結論與建議	67
第一節	研究結論與建議	67
第二節	管理意涵	68
第三節	研究限制及後續研究建議	69
參考文獻	70
附    錄	76
表2-1 加速器與育成中心比較	16
表2-2 創業輔導平台類型	18
表2-3 事業階段及說明	19
表2-4 培育領域類別表	20
表2-5 服務項目類別表	21
表2-6 服務對象類別表	21
表3-1 問卷設計與參考來源	29
表4-1 敘述性統計分析	32
表4-2 創業者訪談個案背景彙整表	34
表4-3 受訪公司的產品內容、參與平台與目前階段摘要表	35
表4-4 受訪公司四大影響摘要表-事業階段影響平台選擇	36
表4-5 受訪公司四大影響摘要表-服務需求影響平台選擇	37
表4-6 受訪公司四大影響摘要表-知識經驗影響平台選擇	38
表4-7 受訪公司四大影響摘要表-參與平台影響發展獲利	39
表4-8 創業者訪談比較分析表-相似觀點	41
表4-9 創業者訪談比較分析表-成功案例吸引差異觀點	42
表4-10 創業者訪談比較分析表-風險報酬評估差異觀點	43
表4-11 創業者訪談比較分析表-對平台依賴度差異觀點	44
表4-12 專家訪談個案背景彙整表	45
表4-13 專家訪談四大影響摘要表-事業階段影響平台選擇	46
表4-14 專家訪談四大影響摘要表-服務需求影響平台選擇	46
表4-15 專家訪談四大影響摘要表-知識經驗影響平台選擇	47
表4-16 專家訪談四大影響摘要表-參與平台影響發展獲利	47
表4-17 創業者與專家訪談比較分析表-相似觀點	48
表4-18 創業者與專家訪談比較分析表-事業階段影響差異觀點	48
表4-19 創業者與專家訪談比較分析表-服務項目影響差異觀點	49
表4-20 創業者與專家訪談比較分析表-服務便利性差異觀點	49
表4-21 創業者與專家訪談比較分析表-成功案例吸引差異觀點	50
表4-22 創業者與專家訪談比較分析表-報酬風險評估差異觀點	51
表4-23 創業者與專家訪談比較分析表-對平台依賴度差異觀點	52
表5-1 事業階段種子期建議適合參與創業輔導平台類型	54
表5-2 事業階段創建期建議適合參與創業輔導平台類型	55
表5-3 事業階段擴充期建議適合參與創業輔導平台類型	56
表5-4 事業階段成熟期建議適合參與創業輔導平台類型	57
表5-5 事業階段重整期建議適合參與創業輔導平台類型	58
圖1-1 研究流程圖	6
圖2-1 育成中心世代業務演進	14
圖3-1 質量連續體示意圖	25
圖3-2 質量局部融合、先量後質、質為主量為輔研究設計	26
圖3-3 案例的研究設計	27
圖5-1 研究架構	66

[1]	BCG (2014)。「台灣創新調查」。經濟部工業局。臺北市。
[2]	王文娟 (2000)。「八0年代以來美日產業政策及產業發展條件之比較分析」。中華經濟研究院。
[3]	吳其蓁 (2014)。「新創事業進駐育成加速器之個案研究：資源諧合觀點」。國立臺灣科技大學科技管理所碩士論文，未出版。臺北市。
[4]	李光斌、袁建中 (2003)。「創業投資事業投資後管理模式之研究-以台灣IC設計產業為例」。國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。新竹市。
[5]	邱錦田 (2008)。「從封閉式轉型為開放式國家創新系統典範」。科技發展政策報導(第三期)，已出版。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。臺北市。
[6]	中華民國創業投資商業同業公會 (2016)。「申請國發基金投資」。取得日：2016-05-18。http://www.tvca.org.tw/information/development_fund。
[7]	黃紀 (2000)。「實用方法論芻議」。政治學報。31。107-139。
[8]	黃紀 (2009)。「民意調查新論，調查研究設計」。五南書局。臺北市。
[9]	黃紀 (2012)。「質量並用法 社會及行為科學研究法(一)：總論與量化研究法，第十三章(初版)」。東華書局。臺北市。
[10]	經濟部中小企業處 (2016)。「創新育成加速卓越服務網」。取得日：2016-01-10。http://incubator.moeasmea.gov.tw/。
[11]	鄭伯壎、黃敏萍 (2014)。「組織與管理研究的實證方法，第十章（二版）」。華泰文化。臺北市。
[12]	Caporaso, J. A. (2009). “Is there a quantitative-qualitative divide in comparative politics? The case of process tracing. In Todd Landman & Neil Robinson (Eds.),” The SAGE handbook of comparative politics, SAGE Publications, LA, pp.67-83.
[13]	Chesbrough, H. W. (2006a). “The era of open innovation,” Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), pp.34-41.
[14]	Chesbrough, H. W. (2006b). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.
[15]	Cohen, S. (2013). “What do accelerators do? insights from incubators and angels,” Innovations, 8(3-4), pp.19-25.
[16]		Deffains-Crapsky, C., & Sudolska, A. (2014). “Radical innovation and early stage financing gaps: Equity-based crowdfunding challenges,” Journal of Positive Management, 5(2), pp.3-19.
[17]	Dutta, D. K., & Thornhill, S. (2013). “The changing nature of intentions and performance in rapidly growing entrepreneurial firms: Evidence from an inductive study,” Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 24(2), pp.1-19.
[18]	Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). “Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges,” Academy of management Journal, 50, pp.25-32.
[19]	Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). “Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm,” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), pp.6-16.
[20]	Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter Publishers, London.
[21]	Freeman, C. (1995). “The ‘National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), pp.5-24.
[22]	Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). “A systematic review of business incubation research,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), pp.55-82.
[23]	Krueger, N. F. (1993). “The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), pp.5-21.
[24]	List, F. (1885). The National System of Political Economy (Lloyd S. Trans.), Pinter Publishers, London.
[25]	Lundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter Publishers, London.
[26]	Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics (First ed.), Macmillan, London.
[27]	Metcalfe, S. (1995). “The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives,” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US).
[28]	Molnar, L. A., Donald R. G., Jack E., Rocco D. P., Hugh S., Dinah A., & Lou T. (1997). Business incubation works, NBIA Publications, Athens, Ohio.
[29]	Morgan, D. L. (2007). “Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantivative methods,” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), pp.48-76.
[30]	Muljadi, E. P. (2012). Innovation Creativity Techniques, Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=qvd_eAgiRZkC
[31]	Muthmainah, & Cholil, M. (2015). “Analysis of attitude, experience, subjective norm and behavioral control on the entrepreneurial intention and behavior: A case study toward the pawners of sharia pawnshop of surakarta branch office, central java, indonesia,” International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 7(2), pp.63-76.
[32]	OECD. (1997). National Innovation System, OECD Publications, Paris.
[33]	Porter, M. E. (1998). “Cluster and the new Economics of Competition,” Harvard Business Review, 76, pp.77-90.
[34]	Reed, D. (1991). “Incubator program: Factors in a profile of success,” Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), pp.61-0_7.
[35]	Rice, M. P. (1992). “Intervention mechanisms used to influence the critical success factors of new ventures: An exploratory study (Ph.D., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute),” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Troy, NY.
[36]	Scarborough, N. M., Wilson, D. L., & Zimmerer, T. W. (2009). Effective Small Business Management: An Entrepreneurial Approach (9th ed.), Pearson, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[37]	Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and The Business Cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[38]	Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). “The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship,” Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Pearson, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp.72-90.
[39]	Shepherd, D. A., & Shanley, M. (1998). New Venture Strategy: Timing, Environmental Uncertainty, and Performance, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[40]	Sulej, J. C., Stewart, V., & Keogh, W. (2001). “Taking risk in joint ventures: Whose throw of the dice?,” Strategic Change, 10(5), pp.285.
[41]	Summers, D. F. (2003). “Considering an individual's entrepreneurial intentions in the design of entrepreneurship courses and programs,” Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), pp.38-49.
[42]	Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. B. (2003). “The past and future of mixed method research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie(Eds.),” Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp.671-701.
[43]	Teddlie, C. B., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.
[44]	Theodorakopoulos, N., K. Kakabadse, N., & McGowan, C. (2014). “What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion for situated theorizing,” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(4), pp.602-622.
[45]	Thillairajan, A., & Jain, A. (2013). “New and nascent enterprises: Analysis of incubation support in India,” The Journal of Private Equity, 16(3), pp.69-85.
[46]	Wagner, J., & Sternberg, R. (2004). “Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data,” The Annals of Regional Science, 38(2), pp.219-240.
[47]	Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.