對風險管理研究的方法採用定性分析方法和定量分析方法。定性分析方法是通過對風險進行調查研究與評估，做出邏輯判斷的過程，藉以提升安全意識，降低意外發生。
本研究將風險管理流程架構與製程安全評估在執行實務上的差異性作為互相比較方式，並進行資料探討之依據。由比較資料分析得到風險管理需與製程風險評估是對等的，雖然風險評估是風險管理中的一個步驟，但化學產業本身是個高度風險的產業，一個不起眼的動作或不當操作，都有可能引起無法彌補的意外，故因此在風險評估與風險控管就需與事實相符且明確，才能有效的避免風險，降低工安意外事件發生的機率。

The method of risk management research uses qualitative analysis methods and quantitative analysis methods. Qualitative analysis is a process of making logical judgments by investigating and evaluating risks, so as to increase safety awareness and reduce accidents.This study uses the differences in the implementation of the risk management process architecture and process safety assessment as a means of comparison with each other and the basis for data exploration. The analysis of comparative data shows that risk management needs to be equivalent to process risk assessment. Although risk assessment is a step in risk management, the chemical industry itself is a highly risky industry. An unremarkable action or improper operation is possible. Cause irreparable accidents, it is therefore necessary in the risk assessment and risk control must be consistent with the facts and clear in order to effectively avoid the risk and reduce the chance of accidents happening.The method of risk management research uses qualitative analysis methods and quantitative analysis methods. Qualitative analysis is a process of making logical judgments by investigating and evaluating risks, so as to increase safety awareness and reduce accidents.This study uses the differences in the implementation of the risk management process architecture and process safety assessment as a means of comparison with each other and the basis for data exploration. The analysis of comparative data shows that risk management needs to be equivalent to process risk assessment. Although risk assessment is a step in risk management, the chemical industry itself is a highly risky industry. An unremarkable action or improper operation is possible. Cause irreparable accidents, it is therefore necessary in the risk assessment and risk control must be consistent with the facts and clear in order to effectively avoid the risk and reduce the chance of accidents happening.

目錄	I
圖目錄	III
表目錄	IV
第一章 緒論	1
1.1 研究動機	1
1.2 研究目的	2
1.3 研究範圍	3
1.4 研究流程	3
第二章 文獻回顧	5
2.1 風險管理與風險評估簡介與背景	5
2.2 風險管理與風險評估管理架構	10
2.3 風險評估流程	13
第三章 化學產業風險管理與製程評估探討	15
3.1 化學產業風險管理評估概述	15
3.2  風險評估與風險管控之差異	17
3.3 風險等級判定與發生機率與嚴重度做等級評定	23
3.4 製程事故項目分析	24
3.5 災害類型評估標準	26
3.6 風險管理績效原因分析	27

第四章 製程安全績效分析	31
4.1 製程安全案例簡介說明	31
4.2 製程事故項目分析	32
第五章 研究結論與研究建議	41
5.1 研究結果與發現	41
5.2 研究建議	42
5.3 研究限制	43
參考文獻	44
一、中文部分	44
二、英文部分	44


圖目錄
圖1-1 2010~2017 工安事故件數2
圖1-2 研究流程圖 4
圖2-1 風險評估步驟 11
圖2-2 風險評估圖14
圖3-1 安全衛生危害鑑別、評估、管制流程圖 16
圖3-2 事故年度趨勢圖25
圖3-3 事故類別比較表25
圖4-1 歷年事故趨勢圖 36
圖4-2 事故評分趨勢圖 37
圖4-3 單位事故次數柏拉圖38
圖4-4 單位事故區分圖38
圖4-5 歷年生產一課事故趨勢圖 39
圖4-6 歷年生產二課事故趨勢圖 39
圖4-7 歷年生產三課事故趨勢圖 39
圖4-8 歷年生產四課事故趨勢圖 40
圖4-9 歷年生產五課事故趨勢圖 40
圖5-1 事故年度趨勢圖 42

表目錄
表2-1 風險的定義 9
表3-1 製程風險評估表17
表3-2 危害源參考表 19
表3-3 危害類型參考表 20
表3-4 形成危害可能因素表22
表3-5 風險指標評估表24
表3-6 事故年度累積表25
表3-7 災害類型評分表26
表3-8 事件類型代碼區分表27
表4-1 事故年度累積表36
表4-2 事故評分表37

一、中文部分
    全球產品策略化學品危害風險評估之介紹，出處財團法人安全衛生技術中心，作者方澤沛、林綉娟、李政憲。
    風險評估觀念與實務-行政院主計處。
    危險性工作場所製程安全評估訓練教材，工研院環安中心。
    OHSAS 18001輔導人員訓練班教材－條文，經濟部工業局、BSI高毅民博士。
    風險評估技術手冊，	經濟部工業局、工研院環安中心。
二、英文部分
　　　Alberts, Christopher; Audrey Dorofee, Lisa Marino. Mission Diagnostic Protocol, Version 1.0: A Risk-Based Approach for Assessing the Potential for Success. Software Engineering Institute. March 2008 [2008-05-26].
　　　Alexander, Carol and Sheedy, Elizabeth. The Professional Risk Managers' Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Current Theory and Best Practices. PRMIA Publications. 2005. ISBN 0-9766097-0-3.
　　　Borodzicz, Edward. Risk, Crisis and Security Management. New York: Wiley. 2005. ISBN 0-470-86704-3.
　　　Crockford, Neil. An Introduction to Risk Management (2nd ed.). Woodhead-Faulkner. 1986. ISBN 0-85941-332-2.
　　　Flyvbjerg, Bent. From Nobel Prize to Project Management: Getting Risks Right (PDF). Project Management Journal (Project Management Institute). August 2006, 37 (3): 5–15 [2008-05-26]. 
　　　Gorrod, Martin. Risk Management Systems : Technology Trends (Finance and Capital Markets). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2004. ISBN 1-4039-1617-9.
　　　Stoneburner, Gary; Goguen, Alice and Feringa, Alexis. Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems (PDF). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. July 2002.
　　　Ward, Dan; Quaid, Chris. The Pursuit of Courage, Judgment and Luck (PDF). Defense AT&L (Defense Acquisition University). March/April 2007: 28–30 [2008-05-26]. .
　　　United States Environmental Protection Agency. General Risk Management Program Guidance. United State Environmental Protection Agency. April 2004.
　　　Standards Association of Australia. Risk management. North Sydney, N.S.W: Standards Association of Australia. 1999. ISBN 0-7337-2647-X.
IRM/AIRMIC/ALARM. A Risk Management Standard. London: Institute of Risk Management. 2002. John Moteff. Risk Management and Critical Infrastructure Protection: Assessing, Integrating, and Managing Threats, Vulnerabilities and Consequences. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service. 2005.